Every person that asks this question should be shoved in re-education, and that’s a charitable response.

It is a question that is singularly only asked by people that want to do very bad and very awful things if they can justify it on the basis of the “gene pool” being “polluted” by “undesirables”.

Literally nobody of good moral standing wants to explore this question because they know damn well what fascists want to do with this information.

EDIT: Lot of downvoters not justifying their downvotes.

There is no reason to ask this question.

If you’re asking this question, why? What do you intend to do with the answer if it’s negative? Let’s consider the possibilities:

1. Nothing is happening to the “gene pool”? Great. Nothing happens.

2. Something is happening to the “gene pool”? Oh that’s bad but we won’t do anything about it because that would be monstrous.

3. Something is happening to the “gene pool”? That’s bad and I am a fascist that wants to embark on a campaign to cleanse our gene pool of this pollution of it.

If you’re asking this question you desperately need to do self-crit because there is no justification for it. There is only a bad outcome, there is absolutely no good reason to be asking it. If you’re downvoting because you don’t think fucking eugenicist fascists belong in re-education you’re part of the problem that is resulting in rising fascism. The fascists continue to grow and you continue to want to do nothing about them, they will not magically go away because you convinced them to stop being fascists through the power of debating them. The options are either rehabilitating them through re-education campaigns or waiting for the situation to boil over and then resolving the situation with bullets instead. The preventative approach of re-education is superior to the liberal approach of uselessly allowing fascists to grow enough to gain power then do monstrous things and only then fighting them later.