Users of the Signal messaging app got hit by a hacker attack. We analyze what happened and why the attack demonstrates that Signal is reliable.

    • bkrl
      link
      fedilink
      -12 years ago

      At the moment I think more than 3000 people. Young app. Needs it to spread.

          • JonesOP
            link
            fedilink
            32 years ago

            Oh, yet another messenger that pretends that it’s the only one that can prevent MITM. Abusive marketing, or plain misunderstanding of what e2ee means? Anyway I wouldn’t trust them just for that.

            • bkrl
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              The code is open. You can check your own doubts.

              • JonesOP
                link
                fedilink
                3
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                Not my point. Their webpage says that others (Signal included) are not protected against MITM (in the case of Signal, there is a note saying “if the server is compromised”). Which is plain wrong.

                • bkrl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  02 years ago

                  Are you aware that, just to start somewhere, Signal asks (and needs) your phone number to make the service work? If you write “go to hell” to a person and two minutes later you regret it that person can accuse you with absolutely legal evidence in his or her favor. Is everything normal?

                  • JonesOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    52 years ago

                    First, that’s completely unrelated to the very concept of MITM. Second, it also shows that you have no clue about how such protocols work (in Signal, in SimpleX, or anywhere else). I really don’t understand why people who are really into secure messengers often don’t really care about how they actually work… I mean it is damn interesting!