• Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 months ago

    That top sentence has a bunch of flavor text. Livestock implies they’re intentionally being kept as livestock. Plants aren’t sentient. That’s like saying evolution is intentional.

    • Nikls94@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Plants aren’t sentient by our understanding of sentience there’s evidence that they communicate via the mycelium network and give their own offspring more nutrients than others. That‘s the two I can think of without googling

      • FishFace@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        What other understanding of sentience would we fucking use?!
        The mycelium network thing is way overblown - it allows some crude, undetectedundirected signals to pass.

        • Nikls94@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I see it as a problem to solve - we know that signals pass because of the results, but we have yet to detect them

          • FishFace@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            I typo’d “undirected” if that affects anything.

            My point is, people talk about this as if it’s the plants having a nice chat and a cup of tea and talking about politics. It isn’t - it’s more like a dog being able to smell some dog piss and understand something about the dog that pissed there.