I do just want to point out that every time someone has tried to argue what you’re arguing. There’s inevitably been an actual expert in the field point out that the way he’s doing it is wrong. He doesn’t actually understand what he’s doing both in terms of using outdated language and how AI works.
Are these experts with us in the thread now? I literally studied Germanic linguistics so I do know a thing or two about eth, thorn and linguistics in general. I’d be interested to hear what you might think would prove that using thorn for both voiced and voiceless dental fricatives isn’t historically precedented. As for the AI stuff, I completely agree, but I never took issue with those criticisms.
I do just want to point out that every time someone has tried to argue what you’re arguing. There’s inevitably been an actual expert in the field point out that the way he’s doing it is wrong. He doesn’t actually understand what he’s doing both in terms of using outdated language and how AI works.
Are these experts with us in the thread now? I literally studied Germanic linguistics so I do know a thing or two about eth, thorn and linguistics in general. I’d be interested to hear what you might think would prove that using thorn for both voiced and voiceless dental fricatives isn’t historically precedented. As for the AI stuff, I completely agree, but I never took issue with those criticisms.