• cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    the us is a two party

    Okay i think I can safely stop taking you seriously here

    and is incredibly corrupt

    Not a bug, working as intended (posadism looking real good about now)

    because of (being two party instead of one?)

    Um… So, wow, have you watched the news in the past decade?

    local vs regional governments

    Again, you’re thinking in the paradigm of what is and pretending you can understand everything, thinking a more abstracted perspective should necessarily corellate with authority, and thinking perspective and authority should be both bundled and personalized.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Why would me giving an example of decentralization leading to corruption not be deserving of being taken seriously? The US uses its decentralized structure for corruption, as it does use centralized structures. My point isn’t that both are bad, but that both have proper and improper use-cases.

      As for perspective vs authority, I’m well aware that one can see without having any power to change anything. I also know that that can become remarkably inefficient and result in catastrophe. We can make hierarchies accountable, democratic, etc, but the fact remains that they exist because of their utility and often necessity. Simply imagining a system devoid of hierarchy and trying to theorycraft it doesn’t actually mean it will function in real life.