• The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I feel like English needs a spelling reform, but that’s never going to happen.

    I like what Americans did with -ise/-ize, but they can take the ‘u’ from colour from my cold dead hands.

    • bob_lemon@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The Problem with that is that English lacks uniformity. There is simply no possible spelling that works for Oxford, Houston, Vancouver, Perth, Lagos and Johannesburg at the same time. Heck, it doesn’t even work between London, Manchester and Edinburgh.

      So which pronunciation do you match the spelling to? What is “High English”?

    • HereIAm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      English is still evolving though. For example it’s not too uncommon to we “through” spelt as “thru”. How long these changes will take to become popular enough to make it into a dictionary is anyone’s guess, but i believe we are slowly making our way there.

    • KSP Atlas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Þing iz, geting pēpel tú axept a speling rēform lyk ðis wöd bē véri difficult, & ēven if it woz, it haz a hy cans ov ōnli bēing parshali adópted

    • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Countless reforms have already been attempted over the centuries, but here we are with this mess anyway. Yeah, that didn’t go as planned.

      I think our best bet would be to switch to a more sensible language altogether. If USA loses its position in tech and entertainment, we’re probably going to switch to Chinese where writing is even more complicated.