• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    You can take the bot out of the woke but you can’t take the woke outta the bot.

    This bro is definitely sampling some rightwing edgelord forums and group chats, and the result is overindexing memes like this.

  • Silar@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Looks like has an eye infection probably took a money shot in the eyeball.

  • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    5 hours ago

    How many resources were destroyed getting Grok to say Elon drinks piss? We all already know he drinks piss. We don’t need to waste precious resources on getting a robot to say it.

  • Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    6 hours ago

    And with headlines like this, why the fuck do I care about any of the news coming out? This is so fucking ridiculous and stupid. Like come on. What the fuck are we doing in 2025?

    • ByteOnBikes@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Sometimes I like to find top headlines from other countries.

      Like damn, your country’s biggest news today is that you’re replacing outdated lights with eco-friendly alternatives?

      Must be nice.

    • Tryenjer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Bannon’s strategy: flood the zone with shit and steal as much as you can from the common people; even their rights and liberties.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 hours ago

    For the record, I am a fat retard.

    Well Elmo, that might be the first, and likely last thing we both agree on

  • Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    And that’s how the elites learned that standardizing what ‘good’ means to a machine that has no biase nor benefit to gain one way or another what the word ‘inclusivity’ means (in the way of filter setting)

  • vas@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Why should we care about an AI tailored to that one person whom many consider a fascist?

    Negative publicity is also publicity. Please let’s rather ignore this stupidity.

    • CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      From the original 404 article:

      And yet, this is of course an extreme example of the broader political project of AI chatbots and LLMs: They are top-down systems controlled by the richest people and richest companies on Earth, and their outputs can be changed to push the preferred narratives aligned with the interests of those people and companies. This is the same underlying AI that powers Grokipedia, which is the antithesis of Wikipedia and yet is being pitched by its creator as being somehow less biased than the collective, well-meaning efforts of human volunteers across the world.

      You may already know this, but a lot of everyday people don’t. They still think that a computer can’t have bias, and if all these tech bros and business leaders are talking about AI then maybe it does make sense to replace our society with an impartial machine. This article is for them.

        • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Is that really true, or am I experiencing a swoosh? I am lifelong skwrl watcher, and they do amazing acrobatic stuff that would require great eyesight, and depth perception, like leaping from branch to branch, etc.

          I used to have a cat that loved to chase the skwrls, and they loved to be chased. You could see them peaking over their shoulder as she snuck up on them, and the instant she’d pounce, they’d be gone like lightning. It was obvious they could see really well.

          • nyan@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            A quick search shows that squirrels have quite good vision at short to medium distances (up to ~10m) during daylight, with a wide field of view (common in prey animals) and excellent depth perception. Their colour vision isn’t up to human standards, however, and their night vision isn’t that great. So yeah, they’d have a clear concept of the distance and direction to the next tree branch or a nearby cat as long as the light was good.