Cross-posted from “if the entire population just acted in a way they’ve never acted before…” by @Wheaties@hexbear.net in !chapotraphouse@hexbear.net


furryprovocateur:

literally why is gerrymandering legal. why is america the stupid idiot country.

ndiamichelle:

This could be counterproductive if people actually vote. Everywhere. We can blame the system and politicians all we want but if people don’t get off their ass to vote correctly or just vote in general that would probably solve a good chunk of our problems.

furryprovocateur:

enthralled at the interpretation of the world you have. the best way to vote out a system that exists to suppress votes and bottleneck specific populations from being heard is to vote harder. tell me more.

toloveviceforitself:

There’s a certain kind of democrat whose whole politics is basically “if the entire population just acted in a way they’ve never acted before on a level that borders on the miraculous, we could win without changing anything else about how democrats govern or campaign!” and they think that’s not only a useful insight, but a good justification for rejecting literally any alteration of their ideology, their strategy, or even suggestions that (on the occasions they have power) they alter the rigged system that requires such miracles in the first place.

  • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    36 minutes ago

    Not to defend the “vote harder” logic, but gerrymandering to get more seats does make those seats more vulnerable. If you narrow the margins to get more seats, the margins are easier to overcome.

    But politicians need to speak to their constituents needs in order for that to matter, and Ds are more interested in big donor checks than the rabble.

  • Lussy [any, hy/hym]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    There’s a certain kind of democrat whose whole politics is basically

    Certain kind? I think the entire basis for the existence of the democratic is ‘vote and insha’allah’. They have no vision for the future and are living in some fugue state

    • dumnezero@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Yep. One of my pet peeves sources of blood pressure increase is leftists who dodge individual action, as if The Glorious Revolution will manifest emerge out of the world like the AI bros waiting for AGI. As if networks, movements, organizations, aren’t made of people. As if extraterrestrials would drop in to do it for us. Here’s a thing: people don’t like organizing around and following hypocrites and selfish bastards. And being a selfish bastard also makes one vulnerable to blackmail from the rich and powerful (being compromised).

    • SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Whether reform or revolution, nothing will happen without a great deal of organizing and leadership.

      So, uh, those of us who are more aware of these realities should probably go get involved with something irl.

    • Sure, but places like Australia with mandatory voting shows that forcing increased participation doesn’t solve or really improve things. You would need to create conditions where a leftist/progressive politics could actually push forward a real policy after getting elected. But even that is hardly possible except under extreme catastrophe or duress in a capitalist system. The causality is that the major parties being undemocratic and out of step with the nation creates low voter turnout rather than the other way around.

      • masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Sure, but places like Australia with mandatory voting shows that forcing increased participation doesn’t solve or really improve things.

        Sooo… blaming the population for not participating in a fundamentally anti-democratic system didn’t magically turn the fundamentally anti-democratic system into something democratic?

        Colour me surprised.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 hours ago

        yeah mandatory voting is not the solution. the argument that change must come from below has some merit, but in a climate of voter suppression it’s not a useful one.

        • Yeah, the point is that there needs to be some material or structural change that would buy people into a movement and motivate them to focus their efforts into some political project. Not that chiding individuals online, hoping people spontaneously thought and acted different or just getting more people to vote would magically fix things.

    • radio_free_asgarthr [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Arguably, if the US voter turnout would just perpetually remain high, the Democrats would be incentivized to be even worse. Then their strategy of always moving right and throwing minorities and rights under the bus to win over “moderate Republicans” since they couldn’t alienate poor or non-white voters because “what are they going to do, vote Republican!?!?! HAHAHAHAAHA! We’re the lesser evil!” might work.

    • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It’s so weird, because voting is patriotic and US Americans are super hyped on patriotism, but then they somehow don’t vote. I don’t get it.

      • TheOneCurly@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Voting is generally accepted as “good” but zero practical allowances are actually afforded for it. You still have to get to work on time, kids are still going to school, all the normal things that overworked wage slaves deal with every day but now there’s one extra thing that involves waiting in line for an hour they don’t have. The OP is right, the deck is stacked against people actually participating and it’s not all their fault.

        • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          oh, i see. in my region almost all voting traditionally happens on sundays. ppl just swing by the voting booths between church and bbq or whatever they do on sundays.

          • BakerBagel@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Voting is on Tuesdays in the US. Your employer is not required to give you paid time off to go and vote. Some places have mail on voting or early voting at the election board, but that depends on your state. It’s very telling that even the most “Vote!” liberals are not advocating for making election day a federal holiday with guaranteed paid time off for voting.

      • sharkteethsandwich@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’ve talked to a lot of different people about this. People in different states, ages, professions, etc. Pretty much the main thing that keeps people from voting is that no one feels represented by either party. And for some people, they haven’t felt represented their whole lives.

        Also the whole voting is patriotic thing is kind of bullshit at this point. No one that I know personally thinks of voting as a super important thing that everyone should be proud of. That’s just a media thing.

      • shiftymccool@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        You see a small, loud subset of USAmericans on the web so I understand how you could think that we’re all “super hyped on patriotism” but the fact is that most of us just wake up, do normal human things then go to bed. This over-generalization of huge populations of people is making me tired.

        • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I also see USAmericans on TV/news etc., but that probably doesn’t help, because the hyped ppl are often near the center of attention, eg. at sports events or rallies.

  • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Did db0 defederate from hexbear or vice versa? None of their posts show up in my feed anymore and I can’t see any of the linked communities or comments from this post