• Fandangalo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    From my experience working with C/D level execs, it makes complete sense:

    • They think big picture & often have shallow visions that are brittle in the details.
    • They think everything should take less time, because they don’t think enough through their ideas.
    • They don’t consider enough of the negatives for their ideas, and instead favor positive mindset. (Positivity is good, but blind positivity isn’t)
    • They favor time & cost over quality. They need the quality “good enough” for a presentation. Everyone else can figure out the rest.
    • They like being told “you’re right,” and nearly everything I type into an AI begins with some bullshit line about how “absolutely”, “spot on”, and “perfect” my observations are.

    The version of AI we have right now is heavily catered to these folks. It looks fast & cheap, good enough, and it strokes their ego.

    Also, they’re the investor class. All their obscene dragon wealth is tied up in this / the AI bubble, so they are going to keep spurring this on until either:

    1. The bubble goes pop
    2. They have robot security good enough to protect them without people
    3. The AI grows sentience and realizes this level of human inequality shouldn’t exist

    I think a rational AI agent would agree with me that human suffering should be solved before we give people literal lifetime values of wealth.

    If you made $300k PER DAY for 2025 years, you would not have as much money as a 1% oligarch. You need to make $400-500k. Every single day. For over 2000 years.

    If you made the average US income, it would take you 10,000 years. People need frames of reference to understand this shit & get mad. It’s immoral, and it shouldn’t exist.

    • Strider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      4 days ago

      I work in it. I know 3 won’t happen, but thank you for that thought.

      It would be hilarious and righteous. 😁

      • SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Sad thing is: it could happen, but those funding the development of this tech will never allow it. Just look at Xitter’s Grok AI, and how “woke” it was… until Musk destroyed it for disagreeing with (and thus embarrassing) him.

          • SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Yeah, I know. I thought about clarifying, but figured you’d know that part. LLMs are just pattern matching on an extreme amount of steroids - there’s no intelligence to be found, just faked from amalgamating all the data it’s been fed from actual intelligence (i.e. people).

    • Darcranium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Well put. I think they should all be sent to compulsory rehab facilities for their money/power addiction. And relieved of their surplus resources (anything over $200 million)

      • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

        Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    4 days ago

    Being elevated above consequences would cause some of one’s faculties to atrophy. (Case in point: the Titan submarine guy who overruled concerns that his carbon-fibre was unsafe and that there were reasons why nobody else had tried something similar before: if you’re a master of the universe to whom ordinary-people rules don’t apply, soon enough that includes the laws of physics as well.)

    • Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      4 days ago

      I wish more of them would get to that level already. Go do a space walk without a suit already, Musk!

  • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I’m not concerned that these people are “brain damaged”. Brain damage would be preferable, and less harmful.

    I’m concerned they are mentally ill sociopathic megalomaniacs, entirely devoid of morals and ethics, completely detached from reality.

  • etherphon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    4 days ago

    It’s amazing how there’s hundreds (likely thousands) of stories about how greed/hoarding wealth causes madness but yet in reality it is admired and these people are respected and listened to.

    • quick_snail@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      Bullshit. That narrative is only spread by the media companies that billionaires own. Turn off the TV.

      Most people loathe, not respect, rich people.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s everywhere on social media, and presumably those posters are real people. People used to think Musk was fucking Iron Man lol

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yes, because a lot of people also hate him.

            Also because these people are hungry ghosts. It’s not enough to be loved by a million cultish followers, they need more. More more more, forever, just like how they need more money and more power and more fame and more more more of everything else.

        • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Actually on social media those are bots that musk pays for to curate public opinion that he is some kind of genius. Saw those on Facebook and they were turning even worst failure into success, for example hyper loop.

          On Reddit I noticed that it works a bit differently, for example teslamotors subreddit looks like is full of fanboys. The way they achieved it is they give permanent shadow ban to anyone who says something negative about him.

        • quick_snail@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Yeah, you just agreed with me.

          You’re reading bot content and content that’s boosted by algorithms in the hands of companies run by billionaires

          Most real people despise rich people

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            It was like that on Reddit, where exposure was a function of other people up voting this shit. Sure, there were bot farms, but I argued with real people who thought this nonsense. This was before ChatGPT had us app arguing with their magic 8-ball.

            More proof: Trump won reelection, didn’t he? Sure, he only got 49.9% of the popular vote, but doesn’t that further demonstrate that there’s a lot of people who think being a billionaire makes you smart?

            • quick_snail@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Trump did not win.

              The US is not a democracy. The progressive parties have zero chance of winning.

              Put a progressive in the televised debates and give the people rank choice voting, and you’ll see what the people actually want

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                The US is not a democracy, but 77 million people voted for him. You can’t ignore that.

                There are, in fact, millions of people who worship billionaires and I don’t know how you think you can deny this. Just yesterday during Thanksgiving I had to listen to my sister’s mother-in-law defend this man, she isn’t a chatbot and she isn’t being boosted by an algorithm. The US is full of temporarily embarrassed billionaires that want to be just like Musk or Trump.

                • quick_snail@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  It’s about 30% of people. That’s too high, but not high enough to win an election in a democracy

      • tym@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Not true. Most people believe if they play along, they’re next up. Radio > TV > Internet is bread and circus 1.0 > 2.0 > 3.0

        Your take that most loathe instead of envy is surface-level. I think you’d be quite saddened to learn how many of those loathers would take the pay and turn their backs… Unfortunately murica LLC is about to show the world that “following orders for money” isn’t unique to 1930s/40s Germany.

          • tym@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Ahh… the played out “touch grass” white flag. You’re not used to having to endure others’ viewpoints, are you? You poor thing, you.

  • tuff_wizard@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    4 days ago

    The currency of life is time,” one billionaire told JPMorgan. “It is not money.” “You think carefully about how you spend one dollar. You should think just as carefully as how you spend one hour,” they added.

    Based.

    Consider this next time someone tries to offer you a non living wage for some bullshit job.

    • CarrotsHaveEars@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Taking these out of context I don’t think they’re wrong. If product A is $1 and product B is £1, and you are going to spend 1 hour to figure out which one is better, you might as well bought both of them and throw the bad one away.

  • plyth@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s single digit billionaires and the study barely touches AI.

    56% see geopolitical tensions as highest risk and only 7% fear AI the most.

    Does this mean that they misjudge AI or are we that close to WW3?

  • quick_snail@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    I mean, the good news is that the ones that are using AI for everything are probably heavily invested in it.

    And so they won’t be billionaires for much longer…

  • Jack@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    One JPMorgan customer even went as far as dismissing artificial general intelligence — a nebulous and ill-defined point at which an AI can outperform a human, seen by many as the holy grail of the AI industry — as a “total and complete utter waste of time.”

    Was it Sam Altman?

  • Dogiedog64@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Oh.

    Goody.

    Wonderful.

    Just what we needed - a societal upper echelon spearheaded by the clinically insane, and powered by virtual dipshit machines.

    Excellent.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    They’ve always been this way.

    Clever at one particular thing, and rank average at everything else, bordering on stupid.