The Department of War (DOW) is receiving well-earned praise for reversing the military’s recruitment crisis. In FY2025, all the branches of the military met or exceeded their recruitment goals.

(The problem) is America’s retention crisis. Given the immensely complex tasks we demand of experienced enlisted service members and officers, the time and money it takes to replace the expertise required to perform these tasks, and how central this expertise is to modern warfighting, we cannot afford to keep hemorrhaging essential talent.

Despite spending nearly six billion dollars on recruiting and retention in recent years, including giving over 70,000 people retention bonuses, people are leaving the military at some of the highest rates of the last decade. For instance, 7% of Air Force officers and 11% of Airmen now leave the service each year, 350% and 550% above the national average, respectively.

Unsurprisingly, the more specialized and in-demand an officer’s skill-set is, the more likely the military is to lose them to the private sector. Four thousand troops left cyber jobs in 2024, despite DOW facing a 16% cyber position vacancy rate. While DOW does not publicly track how many AI experts it employs and loses each year, Georgetown University reports an intense shortage of uniformed personnel who understand both the mission and the emerging technology.

  • CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    ban trangender soldiers

    surprised pikachu when they lose a lot of cybersecurity talent

    inb4 they double down and ban furries too

  • Prox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Unsurprisingly, the more specialized and in-demand an officer’s skill-set is, the more likely the military is to lose them to the private sector. Four thousand troops left cyber jobs in 2024, despite DOW facing a 16% cyber position vacancy rate.

    Yup. DoD pay sucks, and private sector benefits have pretty much caught up. I know people who left government positions for raises of 15%-33%. Government used to be able to pay less but still keep people due to the promise of stability, but those days are long gone.

  • Manjushri@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Non-fascists in the military who don’t like where this nation is going are bailing out. Fascists in the military are getting nice retention bonuses. And oodles of new fascists are signing up because they like the odds that that they will get to murder people, maybe even liberals, gays, and trans people in US cities.

    “Sounds better every time I hear it!” - Pete Hegesth probably.

    • drdalek@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Sounds like a great reason for the current admin to allow this to continue. Flush the ranks of dissent. This is a pretty terrifying thought.

      “The road to fascism is paved by resignations” - Not Me

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        54 minutes ago

        Sounds like a Stephen Miller idea. I do wonder how much he is coaching others and straight up marionetting Trump. It wouldn’t surprise me to find out Stephen Miller is writing some of Trump’s tweets and he is just copying and sending them.

  • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Idk, now that we’re planning invasions on our home soil maybe some people look at it differently now.

    Plus, it’s department of defense.

    • Ithral@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      10 hours ago

      This is true having talked to a few enlisted they are wary of re-enlisting when their contract is up. Anecdotal I guess but at least some people really don’t like where things are going.

    • limonfiesta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Apparently it’s unpopular to call it the DoW, and while I realize that Congress has yet to officially change it, I think it’s a much more appropriate, and accurate, name.

      When was the last time the DoD was engaged in a defensive war?

      So unless they plan on further changing it to the Department of War Crimes, I think DoW is as good as we can hope for a name that aligns with their actual purpose.

      • Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        53
        ·
        10 hours ago

        The U.S. Department of Defense is now also referred to as the Department of War, following an executive order signed by President Trump in September 2025. However, the official statutory name remains the Department of Defense until Congress makes a formal change.

        • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          6 hours ago

          That’s not being a bootlicker. That’s stating the actual official policy of the DoW, disseminated to everyone who has a NIPR account and “proclaimed” in an executive order by the President. It isn’t official law as passed by Congress (yet), but nobody in this administration cares about the law. They are making everyone who works with the DoW call it the DoW.

          Yeah, I hate it so much and still call it the DoD in casual conversation at work, but “they” being the DoW did change the name even if Congress hasn’t.

        • chunes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          46 minutes ago

          It’s not a bootlicker take to want to call a spade a spade. Quite the opposite, I would think

      • mister_flibble@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I understand the point you’re making but refuse to give them the satisfaction.

        Also let’s be real, there’s a distinct possibility it was changed because these dumbfucks can’t spell ‘defense’

    • patrlim@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It’s almost like people join the country to defend it, not to go to war… They should have a department for that!

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Theoretical defense, war is an institution and if not maintained you may be caught wrong footed when it comes a knocking. How many empires, kingdoms, or city states have been utterly annihilated because they forgot how to truly conduct warfare.

          • Zombie@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            How many empires, kingdoms, or city states had satellites watching every movement around the globe?

            How many had mass surveillance of digital infrastructure around the globe?

            How many had an ocean either side of them and 2 (until recently) friendly countries north and south?

            How many had military bases in multiple other countries’ territory?

            How many had a military expenditure so vast it dwarfs all other global military spending combined?

            I understand your point, but when it comes to the American military, they’ve gone far beyond what could ever be justified as defence readiness.

            • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Maybe but that is also a relatively recent development, as recently as 40 years ago there was a near peer that could be a potential threat. While that turned out to be a generous over estimation one does not under estimate their goes, also the US does have quite a few allies that do or could need assistance against far larger threats, though how long that’ll last is anyone’s guess.

              Fact of the matter is the circumstances for which the argument could be made that the US military should be dissolved is relatively new, while the argument about war policy is as old as the US itself. Though personally I don’t think either will matter much longer, the reactionaries and corporations are doing a stand-up job ensuring every empire killing problem is hit simultaneously.

        • EightLeggedFreak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Obviously from all those plucky little 3rd world countries we democratized in previous wars, silly! In other words, we’re just defending ourselves from the consequences of our actions; totally normal and rational and okay to call it defense.

          In case I’m not clear: the US has been the hotdog costume guy for a long time, but we don’t drive a car into the shops we’re robbing, we bring tanks.

        • evenglow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          To defend rich people’s interests. In a capitalist country that is usually fossil fuels and ocean shipping lanes.

          Need to be able to ship in oil from the middle east and everything else from China.

          Poor people have to worry about cops. Rich people have worry about their revenue streams. The military and cops protect those “interests”.

          Remember kids, politicians use the military when those politicians failed at their job but refuse to step down. The military is a weapon not a tool.

  • rayyy@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Maybe young fascists will clamor to join but those who want to avoid committing war crimes will tend to avoid joining the US military.

  • supernicepojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Retirement is 20 years after signing up. 20 years ago was 2025; there was such an enormous push for recruitment then. Expect this trend to continue well into 2028 when the surge ended.

  • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 hours ago

    A sped up license reciprocity system sounds great and may help with military family unemployment but it isn’t going to make a six figure private sector tech job disappear. People use the military to get education and training. Once they have it they leave. Especially if the grass is greener on the other side.