So far I’ve only been trying in vain to get you to provide a shred of evidence for your claim that grad users adhere to the tenets of national socialism and hate the working class. I even expanded it to pointing me in the direction of where to find it so you wouldn’t have to see something triggering or go offsite.
You can’t call me willfully ignorant in anything approaching good faith when I show the work I’ve done to educate myself about your claims and ask for help and you instead call me belligerent.
As I said before, I’m not trying to argue against the defederation. World can and has defederated from all kinds of instances for all kinds of reasons. That’s not what I’m interested in.
I guess this post is calling me a white supremacist?
All through this thread I’m focused on learning what you have to share and in all your replies you obfuscate, try to change the subject, insult and accuse me of crazy stuff like this.
If you have anything to back up your claim that grad has adherents to the tenets of national socialism or users that hate the working class, please post it.
I haven’t for one second tried to avoid evidence or deny it when presented.
Mostly because it was not presented.
But even if you were to say something like “well, there was this one thread with a title like blah blah and some grad users of banned for hate speech in it” that would be better than what you’re doing now, which is calling me names, accusing me of being a Nazi, making the accusation that I’m just not paying attention to what’s around me.
In the time we’ve been commenting back and forth you could have registered a sock puppet on grad, posted some Nazi shit and pointed to it!
So if you can even gesture in the direction of grad users who uphold the tenet of national socialism and say they hate the working class, why not do it? Why not prove your statements? Why deflect and try to change the subject and accuse and call names?
Why can’t you just back up what you say in even the tiniest way?
So I should be able to easily search for things like “national socialism” “working class” and some different permutations of the 25 points and have the proof, right?
But looking for those things doesn’t bring up users talking about how they uphold the tenets or hate the working class. I found people talking about how those ideas are bad and arguing about weather hating some identity means you hate the working class, but no one seriously saying that they hate the working class or that they agree with national socialism.
So that’s why I’m here, asking the same question over and over of someone who now just responds with images.
Is there some equivalency being implied here to say that communists and Nazis are the same?
![Bye Felicia [Crosspost]](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/56140da0-2b80-4a33-990a-62d65cd9b393.jpeg){kind=link}
So far I’ve only been trying in vain to get you to provide a shred of evidence for your claim that grad users adhere to the tenets of national socialism and hate the working class. I even expanded it to pointing me in the direction of where to find it so you wouldn’t have to see something triggering or go offsite.
You can’t call me willfully ignorant in anything approaching good faith when I show the work I’ve done to educate myself about your claims and ask for help and you instead call me belligerent.
As I said before, I’m not trying to argue against the defederation. World can and has defederated from all kinds of instances for all kinds of reasons. That’s not what I’m interested in.
OK Clayton.
I guess this post is calling me a white supremacist?
All through this thread I’m focused on learning what you have to share and in all your replies you obfuscate, try to change the subject, insult and accuse me of crazy stuff like this.
If you have anything to back up your claim that grad has adherents to the tenets of national socialism or users that hate the working class, please post it.
What do you get when you have 10 people at a table with one Nazi?
11 Nazis. Even if you refuse to look at them.
Okay so point at them so I can’t look away then.
Show even a sliver of evidence that grad users adhere to the tenets of national socialism or hate the working class.
I haven’t for one second tried to avoid evidence or deny it when presented.
Mostly because it was not presented.
But even if you were to say something like “well, there was this one thread with a title like blah blah and some grad users of banned for hate speech in it” that would be better than what you’re doing now, which is calling me names, accusing me of being a Nazi, making the accusation that I’m just not paying attention to what’s around me.
In the time we’ve been commenting back and forth you could have registered a sock puppet on grad, posted some Nazi shit and pointed to it!
So if you can even gesture in the direction of grad users who uphold the tenet of national socialism and say they hate the working class, why not do it? Why not prove your statements? Why deflect and try to change the subject and accuse and call names?
Why can’t you just back up what you say in even the tiniest way?
There’s a whole instance of evidence, you don’t see it as evidence because you agree with it.
Okay so you’re talking about all of grad right?
So I should be able to easily search for things like “national socialism” “working class” and some different permutations of the 25 points and have the proof, right?
But looking for those things doesn’t bring up users talking about how they uphold the tenets or hate the working class. I found people talking about how those ideas are bad and arguing about weather hating some identity means you hate the working class, but no one seriously saying that they hate the working class or that they agree with national socialism.
So that’s why I’m here, asking the same question over and over of someone who now just responds with images.
Is there some equivalency being implied here to say that communists and Nazis are the same?
Where is it?
You said there’s grad users that adhere to the tenets of national socialism and who hate the working class. Show me where.
Do anything but deflect, insult or accuse.