Israel’s military has informed the United Nations that the entire population of northern Gaza should relocate to the southern half of the territory within 24 hours, the U.N. spokesman, Stéphane Dujarric, said late on Thursday night, adding that such a movement — involving over one million people — would lead to “devastating humanitarian consequences.”

  • CensorsHateMe@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    48
    ·
    1 year ago

    Looks like they don’t want to give Hamas time to move their weapons. Whoever came up with this method should be celebrated.

    It will force Hamas to give up on hunkering down with their human shields. This counters that, and gives the human shields a chance to escape from the death cult.

    • Aylex@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      “gives the human shields a chance to escape from the death cult” is a WILD way to describe how millions of civilians suddenly have less than 24 hours to move south (where? Who cares?) lest they get absolutely bombed to fuck.

      • CensorsHateMe@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        The alternative clearly wasn’t working. Any time they telegraphed a bombing, Hamas would force them to stay in the building to die so useful idiots would keep criticizing Israel for the death toll.

        Now there’s no excuse.

    • Spzi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      A very slim chance. 24 hours is very short notice, and the circumstances make it very difficult to relocate so many people.

      • CensorsHateMe@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        It defeats the purpose if you give Hamas time to organize. Getting rid of Hamas ASAP is the surest way to minimize civilian casualties.

        • Not_mikey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The surest way to minimize civilian casualties is to not drop any bombs.

          The incursion has been withdrawn, the threat has been contained as much as it can be. Any bombing now is pure retaliation. Any disablement of Hamas strength won by this will be only temporary and will be restored in a few years with more anger, all at the cost of civilian lives.

          If Israel truly only cares about protecting Israeli lives, they’d establish a line, start rebuilding the fence with better surveillance and start negotiating for the release of the hostages.

          • Spzi@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            It makes some sense from a military perspective to destroy certain enemy positions. Centres for command and communication. Missile launch sites, missile workshops, storage facilities.

            Yes, Hamas is probably already very good in adapting to strikes on these, and the infrastructure will be rebuilt in a few years tops. But if that means less missiles fly into Israel for a few years, it could make sense militarily.

            It is a dilemma this infrastructure is interwoven into a civilian, urban area. Whatever you do, someone will have good arguments to blame you.

            Of course, the surest way to avoid [Palestinian] civilian casualties is to not drop any bombs. But since that also means Hamas will have it easier to make and send new missiles, or plan and launch new border raids, not dropping bombs does not maximize [Israeli] civilian safety.

            I’m aware this conflict is way more dirty than it may sound here.