• BASTAHT@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    this would work better I think. It’s not as fancy, but it gives a better idea I think.

  • nicolairathjen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    For McLaren it says n=63, but pictured on the graphic is 85 pitstops, of which 22 are painted orange. 22/63 is the figure used for the percentage though.

      • Nighed@sffa.community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I assume they have done different amounts though, so how would you split it? I assume that the conditions at different races would effect the times.

        • BASTAHT@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Couldn’t help myself and quickly created another version in excel. It’s not as fancy, but feel like it gives a better idea

        • BASTAHT@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I think it would help to use to same grid for the squares for all teams. You’d need a grid of 5 by 14, leave the not performed squares black. In that way a higher colored stack means more quick pitstops, a higher stack of grey squares means a higher amount of performed stops overall.

  • tankplanker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Anybody know what Merc are doing differently that is resulting in consistently slower stops? Has to be something fundamental with their approach.

    • florge@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      They like to play things safe. This served them well when they could rely on having the fastest car, but it’s starting to hurt them now I feel.

    • Microw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      When it comes to pitstops, there are two philosophies:

      A. Do them as quick as possible. For that to work, you need your parts to be manifactured a certain way so everything can be done fast.

      B. Do them as safe as possible. Thats what Merc are going for, and they have optimzed their processes and parts/Tools to do perfect pitstops that are not as quick.

  • frank@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    For a team that often exudes “we have our shit together”, Merc pit stops are just not where most everyone else is. Wonder why?

    • BURN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      They don’t care to try to be faster. They’ve said they’d rather be a tiny bit slower than their competitors rather than just as fast and making mistakes.

      Considering that most of the time RB doesn’t make any more mistakes than them it might just be a BS excuse

      • frank@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Interesting! Not doubting you, but if you have a source handy I’d love to see it. It sounds a little BS since again, RBR doesn’t often make mistakes and does it faster

        • BURN@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Apparently it comes from a James Vowels debrief after one of the 2022 races. I don’t have a specific source since I can’t go listen to audio right now.

          • frank@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Cool! I’ll hunt a little. Be interested to see if he took that mentality to Williams