• cryostars@lemmyf.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not sure why people are so up in arms about this. I read this as a jab at those people who speed wildly past everyone else and cut in at the LAST moment. I still let those people in because I find it is almost always safer/wiser to be passive and yield when driving.

    • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “Cutting in” at the last moment is what you’re supposed to do. If the traffic flow dictated everyone to merge earlier, they would make the merge earlier. This entire thread is filled with confidently incorrect. Yes, you’re supposed to “let” people in. And yes, they’re supposed to drive at the speed limit (“speed wildly”) in the alternate lane until the merge.

      You yield to the merging traffic because that’s how it’s supposed to work not because you’re somehow morally superior. It’s just that one of you (not you) knows how to obey traffic laws and guidance, and one of you (you) is doing what they’re supposed to do, but only because you incorrectly think you’re being charitable.

      • cryostars@lemmyf.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah yeah I get all that and I know how to merge. I was talking more about drivers who are overly aggressive and reckless. Especially in construction zones and when there are accidents. And yeah I guess I do think I’m probably a little morally superior to the jackasses speeding and cutting in aggressively/in really unnecessary unsafe manners in their 3-ton f250s.