• mifan@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    Living in a part of the world where we don’t really tip I have to ask, is tipping your landlord really a thing?

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      84
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Tipping the landlord” Some landlord/employer posted on Twitter how none of their employees/tenants are grateful for the nice things the capitalist provides them with. They said that they’d like to get tipped occasionally. It might have been a shitpost, but it blew up. Now, ‘tipping the landlord’ is an internet gag line. No one in real life tips their land lord.

        • QuinceDaPence@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 year ago

          In addition to that. It’s probably mocking these places where it asks if you want to leave a tip when you didn’t see a single employee your entire visit. Or counter service/fast food etc.

      • lad@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I always thought that it mocks the idea of giving tip for everything everywhere to highlight that tipping is not a very good practice

        • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Always look at it from the other side. If you’re making minimum wage, every extra dollar counts.

    • Knightfox@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s as real as Kids requesting litter boxes in school because they identify as a furry, it’s just meme BS that a specific political group has latched on to and bitch about. It’s definitely not real.

        • Knightfox@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Until I joined Lemmy I would have agreed with you.

          EDIT: Unless you are talking about the litterbox thing, I have heard this brought up as legitimate discussion before. I quickly squashed that conversation, but there are (stupid) people out there that believe it.

        • Chocrates@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I have never seen it and I’ve been renting for 20 years (omg thst is so depressing). I can imagine a landlord with a poorly set up payment processor possibly having it, but that is a stretch

          • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            In my experience the only thing like this would be the bullshit service or convenience fees.

            Add on that most places won’t accept cash and you need a money order.

            I’m just sick of spending money to spend money

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s as real as Kids requesting litter boxes

        That was a more subtle disinformation deflection by conservatives. Schools did need litter boxes for mandated mass shooting lockdown preparations.

        Instead of the horror of children needing to use litter boxes because American conservatives cant regulate their firearms, it was, “Haha, liberals want litter boxes for furries.”

    • Octopus1348@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it’s just a joke that if you tip your landlord, you are really stupid or attracted to him.

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yea. Why tip someone that’s pocketing money that could otherwise be building your equity? Landlords are quite literally just leeches.

        • EatYouWell@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, they aren’t. Not everyone wants the hassle of owning and maintaining a property, or going a few hundred grand in debt to buy a non-liquid asset.

          Apartments and rental units do serve a purpose.

          • goetzit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not everyone, but the vast majority of everyone, and even those who don’t want to buy would still probably be better off with owning instead of renting.

            “Going a few hundred grand in debt to buy a non-liquid asset” a house is probably the best asset you could buy for yourself, and also, do you think you’re saving money renting? Do you think a landlord is losing money on his mortgage? You’re covering the mortgage anyway, and then a premium for not having it in your name.

            • goldenbough@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              Renting over owning is a more stable outlay (no “surprise, you need a new water heater” expenses for renters) and it gives flexibility for moving with any kind of frequency. I agree that home ownership should be more attainable and affordable, but it’s not a clean win 100% of the time for everyone.

              • Arbiter@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                1 year ago

                You’re still paying for the water heater, the expense is just hidden over long term inflated rent prices.

                • goldenbough@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Yes, a buffer built into the rental price (“inflated” is a loaded term; rents can be inflated, but a rental price set to cover mortgage and amortized expenses isn’t by definition inflated), but it’s still stable.

              • lad@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah, also way more stable in countries where you are not protected by the law and may be told get outta the property you’re renting less than a month in advance. And in countries where you’re protected, the landlord will usually get in your arse checking if you’re a fraud, this makes renting quite a bit more of a problem.

          • Chocrates@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            No one wants to rent. Sure landlords serve a purpose in this capitalist hellhole, but if people could live in a single family home that they own most would take that option to rather than be beholden to some shithead that takes a 3rd of your income and just brings you problems

            • Knightfox@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              While it’s true that it would be better for them in the long term, it’s also true that some people prefer convenience.

              I have a coworker that pays the power company extra each month so that if her water heater dies they’ll replace it for her. Why the fuck does the power company offer this service and by the time she needs one she will have more than paid for one.

              Lots of people don’t change their own oil in their cars, it’s easy and cheaper, but people don’t want to do it.

              Coffee… that’s all I’m gonna say on that topic.

              Renting is a service some people want, just like some people want to live in an HOA.

              More people would probably buy a house if they could just pay the mortgage, similar to a rent to own setup, but that’s not an option available to most people.

              • Beelzebabe@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Wouldn’t the convenient (and cheaper) situation here not be to rent, but to own and hire a handyman when needed? I’m just not sure how a landlord offers any kind of convenience to anyone. (Maybe there’s something I’m missing of course.)

    • LostWon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      A while back, there was this thing where some very out of touch landlords were whining about having to actually do things for their tenants and that tenants should tip them for this. Naturally, they were rightfully shamed and ridiculed for it and it never caught on, but the way I first heard about it was seeing another landlord agreeing with the original post.

    • saigot@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It (used?) to be expected to tip your maintenance man at the end of the year in big apartment buildings (there’s even a friends episode about it). Some scummy landlords try to claim that they are the maintenance man and more and so deserve a tip. I have personally had landlords ask for it,