A former Activision executive has sued the publisher in California state court accusing the company of age discrimination and violating the state’s whistleblower protection law, as reported by Law360.

The suit was filed earlier this week by a 57-year-old former tech executive who worked for the company from 2014 until being laid off as part of a restructuring in the Activision Blizzard’s Central Tech department last August.

The lawsuit gives several examples to establish that Activision Blizzard discriminated against him, starting with statements Bobby Kotick allegedly made at a leadership conference that the “problem” with Activision Blizzard is that “there are too many old white guys.” (The suit doesn’t say exactly when the conference was.)

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s still bullshit that age discrimination is 100% legal until you’re 40 years old…

    But that’s what happens when the majority of people making laws are past retirement age. They don’t think anyone under 40 knows anything, so they think discriminating against them is valid.

  • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    70
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Old White dude being pushed out?

    Cry me a fucking river.

    Edit: Downvoters are defending a boomer tech executive. Tech executive salaries at Activision is in the millions range. This guy is pissed he couldn’t buy a fifth house or add another payment to his boat.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      70
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      If the reason you’re being laid off is your skin colour or your age, no matter what color your skin is or what age your are, it’s wrong.

      (Unless you are getting fired for lying about your age and you’re actually under the legal minimum)

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          If that’s the case his ex employer will be able to prove he wasn’t competent to do the job anymore but if there’s communications that prove they did it because he’s white or he’s old and that’s the reason he got laid off, then that’s discrimination plain and simple.

      • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        39
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure, but that sort of “yes black lives matter but all lives matter” doesn’t actually reflect reality. It ignores actual discrimination when we are pretending that white men are historically and presently the overwhelming majority in these fields.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s not a “whose lives matter” issue, it’s a labor rights issue. Age and skin colour aren’t valid reasons to lay off someone competent, the company will be able to prove he wasn’t able to do his job anymore if that was the issue.

          If you accept that a person gets laid off because they’re white, older or a man then you need to accept that a young black woman can get laid off for being too young, black or a woman, that’s equality.

    • FMT99@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t fall for their cynical attempts to divide us. They’ll try to make it about age, race or religion but it’s not. It’s about management vs workers.