• xantoxis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    274
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s true, the fact that we never drew and quartered this guy does seem like a failure of our responsibilities

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It IS our fault! If we were TRULY responsible people he would have already met the GUILOTINE!

    • Gbagginsthe3rd@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      71
      ·
      1 year ago

      Id actually be more forgiving if that was all they did. Except that wasnt enough, so they created a huge disinformation campaign and actively lobbied against meaningful change.

      They have divided their opposition so effectively that we are at the point where levers on our life support systems are being pushed and pulled while our most informed scientists dont know where or when the next catastrophic shift occurs.

      Buckle up, its gonna be an eventful 1000yrs

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This is Exxon we’re talking about here, they killed their research into biofuels and hid their research on climate change in the 70s because of the oil crisis.

  • tree@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    IT WAS ALL THOSE DAMN AVOCADOS, WHY DIDN’T WE JUST SIMPLY STOP EATING THOSE AVOCADOS

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    Carbon capture is “an answer in search of a question”

    I think we all know what that question is by now. “What approach to addressing climate change will make the most money for Exxon Mobil?”

  • asteriskeverything@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am not at all defending anything in the article, and especially the oil industry.

    I hope some people read the article because I found it very interesting and a little challenging to my preconceived ideas. For example I read the first paragraph and my instant reaction was "straight to hell. Do no pass go. Do not collect $200) "

    that the world has “waited too long” to begin investing in a broader suite of technologies to slow planetary heating.

    But then it said some things such as their scientists had reported data predicting climate change in the 70s and 80s and in some cases had even more data than government programs. (I skimmed the article this one sourced) and how this current ceo is basically dancing thr tightrope of being an advocate for clean energy while working to the enemy and trying not to completely neuter them. and frankly, not that I believe this is the case at all but makes me laugh, a lot of what is quoted in the article sounds like an undercover plant trying to minimize harm cuz you can’t do it all at once.

    But yeah in reality fuck that. If you have the capacity to understand climate change and the gravity of the consequences, then literally nothing else should matter besides that short of ensuring your employees quality of life is good

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well yeah, it’s a PR move. Especially because they did their own studies on climate change and learned they would fuck up the planet and then laughed and said “well if we don’t do it, someone else will”

      • asteriskeverything@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Oh for sure. I guess I just see this CEO a little more unique than most capitalist villains. It’s almost comical to me, I feel like he is trying to convince himself he isn’t a bad guy more than anything. Like it all stems from that. But it’s not funny because there are real consequences

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They buried the study for decades. If they actually gave a shit, oil execs could have injected billions into renewable energy R&D and made money hand over fist on selling the resulting tech, but it’s easier to burn the planet down so they didn’t. Oh, not to mention actively screwing renewable projects by buying people in congress. Fuck em all.

    • tegs_terry@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ooh, look at me! I’m making people happy! I’m the Magical Man from Happy-Land, in a gumdrop house on Lollipop Lane!

      Oh by the way I was being sarcastic

      Homer Simpson

    • FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Only if the electricity generated to charge your vehicle wasn’t connected to oil in any way, but you know what’s really environmentally friendly? Walking, biking, and public transit!

      • bouldering_barista@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Free electricity? Check. Living in a city where I’m a 15 minute walk to grocery, food, coffee, and more? Check.

        Having to drive to work 25 miles away is where most of my driving happens.

        • FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          Start job hunting? Apartment hunting? It took a lot of doing but I ended up getting to live close to work and it’s great! Remote work is pretty popular too these days…

          • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I assume you don’t live in the North America then, because in a vast majority of the US and Canada living in a walkable area and living close to work are mutually exclusive.

      • blazeknave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        But you know what’s actually helpful and contributing to the dialogue at this point? Supporting a comrade in their satisfaction that they’re doing better than they were before. You didn’t even acknowledge and validate that before throwing a “yes and” to make your point. Appreciate your well intentioned efforts, but this can turn some people off. I know I’d feel dismissed among other feelings. 🤷Maybe I’m soft.