• Thorry84@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s really simple, it’s a container containing a virtual os, which runs a browser and a webserver to run the app. The app connects to several external api services to do it’s thing.

    It’s like, really simple!

      • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Gets the job done, but shoudn’t and isn’t intended for non-programmer end user.
        I’m not mad at small programs or developers with not much time to setup a distribution pipeline, they should be praised for their work at the program itself. But different OSes have different places to unpack a program and this allows simple updates, we should respect that for consistency at user end. Expect it’s Windows, which is a unspecified mess anyway, let’s go and unpack everything raw on C:\ or into user directory.

  • Heavybell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    How much you wanna bet the “dev” doesn’t realise chromium is a dependency, in this scenario?

    • Z4rK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Warp.dev! It’s the best terminal I’ve used so far, and the best use of AI as well! It’s extremely useful with some AI help for the thousands of small commands you know exist but rarely uses. And it’s very well implemented.

      • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I don’t understand what is the benefit here over a terminal with a good non-LLM based autocomplete. I understand that, theoretically, LLMs can produce better autocomplete, but idk if it is really that big of a difference with terminal commands. I guess its a small shortcut to have the AI there to ask questions, too. It’s good to hear its well implemented, though.