It also failed to install OneDrive. Perhaps because it’s a bus.

  • rem26_art@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    “My bus crashed today” “Oh my god are you ok?” “Yeah, it just messed up a OneDrive Update”

  • fluckx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    TIL the screens on a bus show a static html stored in a one drive directory. The gps location gets sent to an API which then updates the HTML file in the bucket. The screen just reloads itself every 10 seconds.

    • reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Something that could be done with a minimal Linux installation. But by all means, pay for a bloated windows license.

      • SpikesOtherDog@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        They probably didn’t and are using the OEM license on a mini PC.

        Yes, they are still paying for the license on the cost of the unit.

        Yes, it would be much cheaper to use a NUC or ARM board, but you can’t convince an administrator to stake their career on it.

        Besides, if they are running a domain, and all their resources are on a domain, why would they use non Windows devices.

        • reddig33@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          “Why would they use non windows devices?”

          To avoid crap like what you see in the screenshot? 😆

          • SpikesOtherDog@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Well, the question was tongue in cheek. This error seems to be from one drive determining it was necessary to upgrade right now, even when Windows was out of date and not able to handle this version.

            The install shouldn’t have been allowed to run one drive and instead should pull updates from Wi-Fi/cellular on a scheduled task.

            The same thing could absolutely be done with FOSS. Improper setup in that circumstance may be even more interesting.

      • JPAKx4@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Usually there is some reason behind the decision. This may be used by less tech literate people so having the familiarity of windows would be useful, or maybe the machines that are mass purchased are from a company with windows pre installed and it isn’t worth swapping. Maybe someone in the company is helping a friend offload licenses at cost to the company. Sure Linux would work perfectly fine, but it’s not like it’s going to improve the profit of a company or stability to such a high degree that it’s worth it.

    • mediOchre@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Hello! Technologically inept person here. Is there something wrong with using Administrator as the device/user name?

      • Kurokujo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Computers should never run day to day operations using an account with full administrative privileges and for Windows computers, the default full admin account is called Administrator. It’s not so bad on a personal device but for businesses and public facing computers it’s like asking someone to hack your computer. All anyone would need to do to compromise that system is plug in a keyboard and they could install remote control software or anything else they wanted. I hope that explanation helps!