Why China’s words at top UN court could signal stronger support for Palestinians
www.scmp.com
Chinese diplomat’s comments at ICJ appear to endorse armed struggle against Israel in what analyst calls an ‘unanticipated shift’ in stance, but others deny this marks a radical departure, noting Beijing still favours two-state solution.

Archive link

  • Chinese diplomat’s comments at ICJ appear to endorse armed struggle against Israel in what analyst calls an ‘unanticipated shift’ in stance
  • However, others say comparisons between speech at World Court and Mao-era rhetoric are overstated, noting Beijing still favours a two-state solution
  • eatCasserole@lemmy.world
    101·
    9 months ago

    Shawamreh said Beijing’s early response to the war in Gaza emphasised non-partisan condemnation of “all violence” – a position Israel criticised as unclear and ambiguous –

    Alright then let’s be clear FREE PALESTINE 🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸

    • bartolomeo@suppo.fi
      11·
      9 months ago

      It was unclear and ambiguous because it didn’t say explicitly that Israel should have a monopoly on violence. Also anti-semitic, probably.