• amio@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Semmelweiss. His radical idea of “surgeons ought to wash their hands” saw him widely ridiculed and reduced to poverty, and he died in an institution.

    • sushibowl@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      Semmelweis discovered that a particular type of infection was much less likely to occur when doctors washed their hands with chlorinated lime water between doing an autopsy and examining a patient. However he did not know why or how this worked, and did not discover microorganisms (which were already observed by Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek some ~180 years earlier).

      • Zron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        If I knew something that everyone could do to dramatically reduce the risk of life threatening infections, and nobody listened to me, I’d be kind of a dick too.

    • Lizardking27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Semmelweis didn’t discover microbes. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek first observed microbes in feces using the first microscope (the Leeuvenhoek microscope), which he also invented.

  • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 months ago

    What I love is that when Van Leeuwenhoek first saw microorganisms in his microscope he named them “animalcules”, as in animal + molecule. Isn’t that freakin cute?

  • OpenStars@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 months ago

    And if you believe that, then you’ll believe anything… that is supported by hard evidence and deducted from those by sound logical principles.

  • RoabeArt [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Before Louis Pasteur’s disproving of spontaneous generation, most people believed that bacteria and putrefactive organisms like maggots etc. spontaneously poofed into existence, like a video game character spawning. Pasteur suggested that maggots came from flies laying their eggs on rotting meat etc, and that bacteria were everywhere and will multiply quickly under the right conditions. A lot of people at the time thought these were crackpot ideas.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    In the Discworld books witches are much like local doctors. There’s a young witch that can’t convince a family to move the privy away from the garden, which is making them sick. She tries to explain there are tiny, tiny animals that are coming from the poop and that’s what’s making them ill. They smile politely and don’t change anything.

    The old witch comes along and it explains that the problem is the goblins in the outhouse and to move it far away from the garden. They happily do so.

  • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Wierd part is you can actually see it with a microscope. Anime Parallel world pharmacy made more sense then real life.

    • Carrolade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      There were a few steps in between. Miasma theory said bad air/smells caused disease, which tried to explain infections spreading person to person. You might wear a satchel of basically potpourri to protect from plague if you believed this one.

      Another was the “body humors”, where disease was thought to be caused by imbalances of four basic fluid types in the body. If you believed this one, you might try to treat someone by draining a whole bunch of their blood. Y’know, while they’re already sick.

  • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Imagine this guy trying to explain this discovery to people who spend days reading and responding to articles trying to calculate how many angles can fit on the head of a pin.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      The angles you can fit on a pin head depend entirely on the precision you’re using. Quite a few with nanoseconds of a degree. Not many with radians.

      (You mistyped angels)

  • Eylrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Horton Hears a Who if Horton was the one saying “Boil that dust speck! Boil that dust speck!”