IMO, The US has crumbling infrastructure, corrupt government, dangerous cities, and a lot of homelessness, among so many other problems. Hell, millions of people in the US don’t even have power right now.

What’s the difference?

  • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    Because the actual definition of a 3rd world country doesn’t define the USA as one…that’s why. You’re adding things that don’t fall into the definition.

    • WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m not trolling, I’m genuinely asking. What doesn’t fall into the definition of a third world country?

      • perviouslyiner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago
        • 1st world = US, NATO, and their allies.
        • 2nd world = USSR, China, the Warsaw Pact, and their allies.
        • 3rd world = everyone else.

        e.g. Switzerland would be a 3rd world country by the original definition.

      • ZephrC@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        5 months ago

        Third world actually came from the cold war. There were the two major sides, but then there was a whole bunch of countries that weren’t really on either side. A whole “third world”. Of course, a lot of those countries were poor, so the term came to be associated with that, but there really isn’t a coherent definition of what it means to be a third world county. It has never really been about the standard of living for the average citizen though. More about whether a country is a bully or the bullied on the international stage, and we all know where the US falls on that spectrum.

      • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s a term rooted in geo-political alliances and power standings, not economic status