• Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    217
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    Isn’t claiming territory that doesn’t belong to you as yours the definition of imperialism?

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      96
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      They get around this by using a version of Lenin’s definition of imperialism. Lenin characterised imperialism as, in very simple terms, the way that powerful capitalist countries exploit poorer countries (or straight up colonies, especially considering the time in which Lenin was writing). Of course they use a version of this that specifically defines it as just literally anything the countries they don’t like do, leading to ProleWiki insisting that Russia is not imperialist but Liechtenstein is

      • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        Similarly to how ‘reactionary’ just means ‘bad’ to these people. For the record a ‘reactionary’ is somebody who wants to restore a previous status quo. It’s not inherently good or bad.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Reactionary, in political science terms, is the opposite of radicals. Radicals are to the left and reactionaries are to the right. In practice, people on the internet tend to use radical for both, but I wish the distinction was made more clear.

          • denshirenji@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            You are correct. Radicals want things to change in an extreme way, and reactionaries are just that, reactionary to change. Not sure why you got downvoted for knowing what you are talking about.

            Language does change, though, and often laymen use words differently than subject matter experts.

            • frezik@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              While I usually try not to be prescriptive with language, it has a place. The distinction between radical and reactionary is a useful one.

          • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            No. Radical is simply somebody who wants to fundamentally change society. It’s not the opposite of a reactionary, in fact, you can be radical and reactionary at the same time.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        we get around this by looking back and seeing all that territory was separated by the empire.