• essteeyou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    So, wading in here with a gut reaction and no nuance, he’s charged with all these crimes because the platform he runs has them being organized between its users?

    Who do we arrest if a crime is organized via phone call on T-Mobile’s network, or via mail?

    Is it a case of cooperation, where Telegram is completely refusing to help, or is it just a case of “encryption bad, privacy bad” from the French government?

    • funtrek@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      A service provider is not responsible for the content people publish on their service. But if they knowingly allow criminals to publish and refuse to cooperate with courts and police, they become responsible.

      • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        But the level of cooperation required means they have to break eee to remain in the clear. Doing that means they lose almost all reason to exist in the first place. This is a no-win scenario.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t know anything about this but when USA calls someone a terrorist, it’s always about money or power in some form.

  • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    The lengths that the military surveillance state will go to in order to invade our invade our privacy. This has nothing to do with terrorism, fraud or child porn, this is 100% him not allowing back doors to his app.

    • doodledup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      This has nothing to do with privacy either. First of all Telegram is not a private messenger. Secondly, this is a about public forums and groups called Channels. This has nothing to do with backdoors eithe. They are simply asking them to do moderation on chats they already have access too.

      Telegram has full access to this data and knowingly ignores child pornography and other criminal activity. If Facebook did such a thing for years you’d be screaming right now.

      • Jack@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        I haven’t seen CP on either platform. How are you sure there is CP in telegram? How do you know there isn’t on Facebook?

        • essteeyou@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          I think we all know that it has definitely appeared on both platforms. I think it’s a case of “what did the company do about it?”

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    So they’re saying this guy is a terrorist, drug trafficker, money launderer, pedo?

    It sounds like a reasonable list of crimes with solid evidence. \s