The “Uncommitted” movement seeking a change in the Democratic Party’s approach to the war in Gaza on Thursday announced it is not ready to support Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris — while urging voters not to back Republican nominee Donald Trump or third-party candidates who could help Trump win the November election.

The “Uncommitted” group “opposes a Donald Trump presidency, whose agenda includes plans to accelerate the killing in Gaza while intensifying the suppression of anti-war organizing,” the statement continues. Additionally, the group is “not recommending a third-party vote in the Presidential election, especially as third party votes in key swing states could help inadvertently deliver a Trump presidency given our country’s broken electoral college system.”

  • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    I can get behind this. Sure, we can criticise Team Blue for slow-dragging their feet on protecting Palestinians. Never said we couldn’t. That said, there’s clear consequences to a Trump victory. The Uncommitted have made it clear they grasp this and ask you to vote for Harris, even if they can’t endorse Harris. Staying home, voting third party, or heaven forbid, voting Trump will just make things in the Middle East FAR worse.

    • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      “Voting is just a way to pick the person that will be sitting across from me at the negotiation table next year”, is one of the ways to think about it.

      Harris‘ policy on Israel is ambiguous, weak and too-little-too-late. But you’ll get further trying to influence her administration than Trump 2.0.

      • Eldritch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        The ambiguity is ironically a good sign. That she isn’t outright committed to the status quo. But rather not willing to signal her actual position. If she came out strongly against Israel and for Palestine. Unfortunately that would be a large hindrance to her candidacy in the current climate.

        It’s a shame that those illegally occupying Palestine have such influence over our government. Especially after their terrorist attacks of the last few days. Not to mention the decades long slow genocide that’s only accelerated in the last year.

        • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          She saw the Genocide Joe protests and is now “ambiguous” on this matter to pretend she isn’t exactly like Biden on this subject.

      • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Let’s be honest. Without biden/trump it would be a non issue. Trump would smother out all reporting on the subject replacing it with trauma to the American people.

      • lorty@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        3 months ago

        Well, your thought experiment actually just agrees with the uncommitted, since if they don’t want to negotiate now that they want your vote, what hope you have after you lost that leverage?

        • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I do agree with the uncommitted: voting third party because of Palestine is for idiots.

          That said, if you are a political activist, and you think your one vote is the only thing you have to offer, you need a new ducking job.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      For real, that’s all I’ve been saying whenever people start come in and start bashing on Harris and pushing false equivalence. Like, yeah, Biden is super bad on his policy towards Israel and Gaza; I HOPE Harris will be better; I KNOW Trump will be worse.

      That’s it. That’s the whole dynamic. That’s the only two choices we have as members of the American electorate.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        33
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        bashing on Harris and pushing false equivalence

        You claim the Ds and Rs are the same, but you can very clearly see that the Ds are in favor of 10% less infanticide.

        That’s the only two choices we have

        The genocidiers have us by the balls, folks. Nothing you can do but voice your full throated support for one of them.

        • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          The genocidiers have us by the balls, folks. Nothing you can do but voice your full throated support for one of them.

          Not only that, you must also shout down anybody who says they don’t want to support genocide. Only full loyalty is acceptable.

          Oh so you’re likely voting dem anyway because you aren’t stupid and/or racist but you also say Harris should abide by US law and stop arms sales to Israel? WOW LOOKS LIKE WE HAVE A TRUMP SUPPORTER HERE BOYS

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            It is deeply fucked the way social media has conflated opposing genocide and supporting The Other Team.

            Really reeks of the Bush Era “You’re with us or you’re with the Terrorists!” when it came time to invade Afghanistan and Iraq.

        • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Don’t you understand the difference? All of them can die of rape and starvation as of now or all of them can die of rape and starvation while Trump is president.

          CaNt YoU SeE tHE DiFeReNcE? (This was annoying to type on mobile.)

          These people are delusional. Somehow there’s many situations we can’t do anything about (like our politicians cannot even show disapproval over rape country called Israel even though we are their biggest benefactors) yet somehow not voting Democrat is the end of the world. We cannot do anything to make anything better but putting pressure on politicians is also bad. Oh, how convenient. Why can’t they admit they have to think of their own interests first (at least the few things the Democrats will allow them).

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            CaNt YoU SeE tHE DiFeReNcE? (This was annoying to type on mobile.)

            A for effort

            Somehow there’s many situations we can’t do anything about (like our politicians cannot even show disapproval over rape country called Israel even though we are their biggest benefactors) yet somehow not voting Democrat is the end of the world.

            Was listening to a WTYP episode about stealth jets, and they priced all the different kinds of aircraft in “multiples of ending national poverty”. ($10B is the current working figure)

            The F-22s we used to shot down Chinese weather super spy balloons came in at 20x the cost. That’s the only combat mission the plane has flown since it entered service over a decade ago.

            Why can’t they admit they have to think of their own interests first

            These numbers are so big and these systems are so vast that it’s easy to lose sight of them entirely. The idea that we could all live very comfortable happy lives if a tiny minority were to stop the war profiteering is very difficult for your retail Democrat voter to grasp.

            • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              That’s the only combat mission the plane has flown since it entered service over a decade ago.

              Interesting story. I do wonder if any of this equipment was made to be used or is there “just in case.”

              The idea that we could all live very comfortable happy lives if a tiny minority were to stop the war profiteering is very difficult for your retail Democrat voter to grasp.

              This is a great summary of the issue.

        • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          So you’re saying I should still vote for infanticide? I don’t want that kind of blood on my hands. That’s the issue in the Trolley Problem.

          • Asafum@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Not voting is just allowing the worse option which still puts blood on your hands. Inaction still has consequences.

            We don’t live in a world where we have the ability to be completely pure, it’s an option that simply doesn’t exist unfortunately. :(

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            I don’t want that kind of blood on my hands.

            The joke of the modern American electoral system is that all the “viable” candidates are bloody. And if you abstain from voting or vote third party, you’re accused of supporting the winning candidate, regardless of your personal politics.

            That is, I think, a big part of what drives the street protests. Americans who don’t want to be complicit in this barbarity have no other actionable way to express their condemnation.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          You claim the Ds and Rs are the same, but you can very clearly see that the Ds are in favor of 10% less infanticide.

          Be fair. They’re in favor of 10% slower infanticide.

        • holycrap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          The path to ending the conflict is through boycotts, not the president. But that takes time, so 10% less killing makes sense as a stop gap.

          There is precedent for this. See apartheid South Africa. Palestinian freedom will seem impossible until it becomes inevitable.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            The path to ending the conflict is through boycotts, not the president.

            US House overwhelmingly passes anti-BDS resolution

            We’ve already seen individual states go so far as to issue state sanctions aimed at BDS movements. US House Resolution 246 seems to be an exercise in vote counting by the AIPAC Lobby to advance a national bill to the same effect.

            Palestinian freedom will seem impossible until it becomes inevitable.

            The South African Apartheid system likely would have held up indefinitely if the US was the only country involved deciding its fate. And the Afrikaners had far less influence over the US Congress than the Israel lobby.

            • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Pressure needs to be applied everywhere, from awareness by friends/family to personal BDS to local representatives to DNC delegates to Presidents. Anti-genocide and anti-apartheid momentum has made great strides in the last year, it’s critical to keep that momentum growing. This will definitely be more difficult than the South African Anti-Apartheid movement

    • Thanks for this comment, clearing it up!

      I was about to ask this - because if they aren’t endorsing Harris but also asking folks not to vote for the GOP or third parties, then who should we vote for? Surely they’re not saying stay at home and don’t vote, right? (That was the only possibility that seemed not covered by the post’s description.)

      So another way to look at it is - (if one ignores the way they mince words and instead just looks at the practical effect then) they are in fact endorsing Harris, but in a muted fashion to express their displeasure over Harris’s stance on Gaza.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      Sure, we can criticise Team Blue for slow-dragging their feet on protecting Palestinians.

      HA.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Biden isn’t dragging his feet…

      He’s moving at light ing speed (for his age) to support Israel’s genocide in anyway he can, including going around congress illegally to avoid a delay of just a few days.

      I just hate how all the blame is put on voters, it’s literally Kamala and her campaign teams job to get votes, and despite how much they hate the thought, that means giving Dem voters what Dem voters want.

      And they don’t want to be citizens of pretty much the only country still supporting the genocide by sending munitions. Especially when it’s a violation of the Legacy Lehey law and bare minimum we should be demanding Israel track the use of US supplied munitions.

      Like. You’re completely underselling the damage Biden and other party leaders are causing…

      And then claiming you can’t understand why people don’t like him or the party’s stance.

      Why dont you spend your time and effort trying to stop a genocide instead of telling people they have to support a genocide?

      Your way even if we win. Still a genocide.

      If we demand Kamala and party leadership stop breaking US and international law, and they actually listen

      Kamala could moonwalk into the oval office and Israel wouldn’t be able to continue their genocide.

      What’s so hard about picking the best path?

      We can stop trump and genocide or just stop trump.

      Seems like an easy choice to me

      • makyo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I mean if I understand you correctly you’re saying bascially the same thing as OP - can hold Biden/Harris feet to the fire while working to re-elect Kamala and defeat Trump.

        • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          And the fun part is these aren’t my words. These are the words of the “Uncommitted” faction that wants to hold Democrats’ feet to the fire. They’re saying that at the moment, there’s bigger fish to fry – a MAGAt movement that would make everything Team Blue has done look like child’s play in comparison. So, Mr. Give Some Fucks isn’t just arguing with me. He’s arguing with the guys and gals actually advocating for Palestinians.

    • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      3 months ago

      Sure, we can criticise Team Blue for slow-dragging their feet on protecting Palestinians.

      Incredibly generous way to put it. They are providing the weapons that maim and kill the innocent children. I criticise them for the blood on their hands

  • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s good to get that out explicitly, because it has been the focus of a lot of misinformation out there.

    The cause of Palestinians is not served by a second Trump presidency. Preventing it should be a major aim of any pro-Palestinian advocate.

    • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      That it’s the advocacy group trying to hold Biden and Harris accountable for the continuation of the atrocities in Palestine saying this should make it clear. The actual people on the ground may feel strongly about Palestinian civil rights, they know where their bread is buttered and that the other realistic alternative in this election is “Orange Hitler”, to use another poster’s euphemism, is just plain horrible.

  • xenoclast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Pretty sure if Trump gets elected people will be too busy with their own local genocides to care about Gaza.

    • nelly_man@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      And his advisor on, and ambassador to, Israel literally wrote a book promoting a one state solution where he said that the US has a Biblical obligation to help Israel win. His ultimate plan is to set up an apartheid state where Palestinians do not have the same rights as Israelis.

  • harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    “Well, let’s cross our fingers and hope the Democrats can get out the vote despite our virtue signalling.”

    This announcement is just pointless.

    • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      At least we’re not getting the ‘vote third party’ spiel. I’ll never hold a person’s opinions on the Dems against them. I just don’t want anything done or suggested that will help Trump and his merry band of assholes.

  • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    Two people refusing to vote for anyone or voting for a third party has the exact same impact as one person voting for Trump instead of Kamala.

        • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          You do understand you can’t force people to vote how you want them to right? Pretty basic concept of voting you are missing.

          • Red_October@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Who’s forcing anyone to do anything? You can stay home and jerk off to how righteous your protest vote was and none of us will actually force you not to. Whether or not you recognize that it was just another vote Trump didn’t have to overcome to win is on you.

            • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              Force, coercion, manipulation maybe. Pick whichever word is right for you. If your position is that there is only one valid perspective for everyone in this country, then you are part of the problem.

              You will never browbeat people into joining your position, but you keep trying and call it a good effort all you want.

              If you really wanted to change third party or undecided voters opinions, I’d recommend a different approach.

              • Red_October@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                I notice you left out “Persuasion.” If you think the presentation of facts regarding the basic function of our voting system is somehow force, coercion, or manipulation, then I can see why you would want to do your part to get Trump elected, and you’re a lost cause.

                Either Trump or Harris are going to win the election. No third party candidate has any serious chance of winning, and nobody who actually understands how the election works thinks they do. You are ALLOWED to vote third party if you want to (see how nobody is FORCING you not to?) but doing so is just another vote the real contenders don’t have to beat. If you’re more left leaning, that means it’s a vote Harris would have had that Trump doesn’t have to beat.

                • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  The huge mistake you make in the freedom to vote is that people are free to vote for WHATEVER REASONS THEY WANT TO.

                  No matter how many times you say it, if I vote for the green party, I am not voting for the republican party.

                  I’m telling you this because your rhetoric is doing the opposite of what you think it is. Putting third party voters on the defensive, and again avoiding any conversation about why they would vote third party in the first place, is an awful way to change someone’s mind.

                  Calling people Russian shills or saying they don’t care what happens to the country doesnt help either.

        • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Does it really matter the reasoning when the goal is to force people to vote how you want them to?

          You would benefit from coming to terms with the fact voting is a free choice no matter what you shout into the void.

          • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Does it really matter the reasoning when the goal is to force people to vote how you want them to?

            Force?.. Are people threatening you with harm and watching to make sure you vote the “right” way? The closest to that that I’m aware of is the right-wing “poll watchers” who intend to try to intimidate people and suppress voting rights or, the FPTP, two-party system itself that.

            You would benefit from coming to terms with the fact voting is a free choice no matter what you shout into the void.

            Freedom of choice does not mean freedom from consequences. You would benefit from taking responsibility for how your decisions impact the lives of others, especially those who are not so privileged as to feel insulated from impact of a possible fascist state.

            • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              Fear makes people irrational. Like when they go in public forums and argue there is only one moral way to vote. Sounds kinda preachy to me, huh.

              Hey what’s good for you must be good for me right? You’ve convinced me, tell me who to vote for to make your life better please? Is this sort of like trickle down politics?

    • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      3 months ago

      TIL that 92 million non voters actually voted for Trump in 2020, but somehow Biden became president.

  • Soup@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    And yet they refuse to support the one person that could keep him out of office.

    Fucking geniuses they are!

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      Israel has already slaughtered a full 10% of the population of Gaza.

      How many Palestinians will be left to save by the time Biden leaves office?

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Israel has already slaughtered a full 10% of the population of Gaza.

        idk why you put full here, i feel like just saying 10% would work just as well, seems more semantically confusing to me more than anything lol.

        I’m not sure what it’s trying to imply.

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            maybe, i feel like you would just say “10%” or like you said “at least 10%” then, considering that numbers are like, really specific.

            If you weren’t being specific you would say something like “about 10%” implying somewhere around it, 7-13% probably.

            full just reads a little weirdly in that context.

  • freshcow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I think everyone who is being intellectually honest knows full well that Trump would be worse. The problem seems to be that the Democratic party has decided it can take the votes of the left wing of its party for granted. If the left is not willing to actually follow through and withhold their votes, then the Democrats know that they never have to appease them. It’s really a lose-lose situation until the Harris campaign shows some moral courage or takes seriously the possibility of losing votes over this issue.

    • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Exactly. We know how bad Trump is, but Biden in his disastrous “hug Netanyahu” policy went out of his way to not just ignore pro-Palestinian voices but actively insult them. He said “I have zero trust of Palestinians” and publicly supported the invasion of Al Shifa hospital despite the ridiculous and debunked claim that there was a 3 story underground Hamas base beneath it. He overrode his advisors and removed pro-Palestine language in all his October and November speeches. He met with Israeli victims but never met a single Palestinian one and even had his tour bus detour around towns in Michigan that had too many Arab-Americans. He claimed he was looking for peace but vetoed ceasefire attempts and bashed Palestinians in general. (He later privately told people he meant to bash Hamas and shouldn’t have use the words interchangeably, but never apologized).

      It’s one thing to hold your nose and vote for Biden, but it’s quite another to vote for him when he’s so unapologetically anti-Palestinian. And his attempt to get Arab-Americans to vote for him when he helped kill their relatives is to ignore them and say “Trump would be worse.” That’s not a winning strategy and he wants to claim he both needs our votes to win but also that we aren’t politically relevant.

      I hope Biden retires in shame and that Harris does better. She already had been meeting with Palestinian-American families when Biden refused to be seen with one.

    • banshee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      “If the left is not willing to actually follow through and withhold their votes”

      Wthholding your vote only helps Trump. Candidates know they have to appease the folks with money. We’re fighting the wrong bad guy - focus on reversing Citizens United.

        • banshee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Everyone knows something I don’t. It’s a good thing for folks to be involved in the democratic process. Politicians aren’t gods or super heroes. They can be wrong as easily as the rest of us.

          Citizens United allows those with deep pockets to speak much louder than the rest, and this is a huge problem.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    UN votes against Israel’s occupation of Palestine: Will it change anything?

    Seems like the rest of the international community is moving on this whether or not the US leadership approves of it.

    Barking up the “Who will you vote for?” tree, when neither American candidate for President has expressed an interest in ending the holocaust in Gaza or prosecuting the litany of war crimes in surrounding Lebanon, Egypt, and Jordan, seems pointless.

    If anything “Vote for Kamala because hey remember that genocide we’re financing via Israel?” seems like its going to scare away more voters than it attracts.

  • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    People who are uncommitted because of Gaza are fools to think that their reticence won’t have any consequences in the country.

    Having said that there is no hope for Gazans from US since both the parties are bought and paid for by the Israelis.

    Russia take note - US only lets those foreign countries to influence the election who are willing to buy both the parties.

    • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Nobody is claiming that and you’re attacking a strawman.

      The problem is we don’t want to reward politicians for their bad behavior “because Trump is worse” or get blood on our own hands by voting for someone who will continue the same deadly failed policies. Have you ever heard of the Trolley Problem? It’s not as straightforward as you think.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        The article is about the group publicly saying it is important to vote with the intention of keeping Donald out even while they cannot endorse Harris. Maybe you should join them?

        This trolley problem has a large number of the same people across two tracks, but one of the tracks has a large number of additional people that the other track bypasses. It is not a complicated trolley problem to solve.

        • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          “A philosophy problem that has existed for thousands of years can be easily solved by me!”

          That tells me all I need to know about you.

          • barsquid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            If you want to try some reading comprehension you’ll see I disagree it is a trolley problem at all. Pretending it is despite having the difference pointed out does tell us a lot about you.

            I think on this issue I’ll consider the thoughts of the group in the article, instead of someone dead set on describing the issue as something it is not.

      • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        The Trolley Problem is all about how there’s frequently no good options in a scenario. People are gonna die whether or not you make a decision, and you’d be right to walk away from that lever if there were equal amounts of death on each track. But there frequently are not equal situations. Six people versus one person. A kid versus an old man. 7 Nuns versus 10 Lawyers. The person you love the most in the world versus the person you hate the most in the world.

        Sure, you have to be discerning and look for any tracks that don’t have something tied to them. That’s why I mention that self-driving cars, thanks to their sensors, don’t have to hit the bus full of school children or the SUV full of nuns – they’ve seen the bus and the SUV and the idiot merging into traffic and the idiot on their phone and everything else due to their 27 different cameras and their LADAR and RADAR and so on, and to the advanced AI computer that can pay attention to all those sensors at once, and have calculated a path to escape to the track that doesn’t have anyone being killed in the phony concocted examples of why AI cars are bad.

        But in regards to the Presidency, there literally is a Trolley Problem here, and it IS as straight forward as you say it isn’t. Come January of next year, one of two people will take the Oath of Office.

        • Kamala Harris, who you say is a genocidal maniac who will enable the mass murder and enslavement of Gaza by the Israelis…
        • Donald Trump, who himself has said is a genocidal maniac who will not only enable but accelerate the mass murder and enslavement of Gaza by the Israelis, and who plans on bringing that treatment right back to home for LGBTQ+, minorities, non-Christians, and women.

        Jill Stein, Cornel West, Chase Oliver (seriously, I had to go look this guy up!), and whoever else promises you they can fix a Broken Washington won’t be elected to that office. Period. End of line. All they’ll accomplish is taking votes away from the major party candidate closest aligned to your positions, and ensure the other guy gets into office. The track of no genocide is an illusion, a mirage that fades the moment you look at it too hard. I know. It sucks. We all want more options for people to represent us. But those are the rules, and have been the rules for literally this country’s entire existence. It sucks, but denying reality won’t help. Come January, one of two people will take the oath of office: a Republican and a Democrat, just like it has been for the past 150 years, and even before, albeit with Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist or Democratic-Republican vs. Whig.

        I’m going to vote for the person who will do the least harm to those I care about. I’m going to push and push hard for everyone else to join me in voting for her. I’m going to constantly call out this ‘but third party!’ stuff. Because for everything you have accused Harris of allowing, Trump will not only do that, but a dozen other hateful things.

        • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          All that talk and you still missed the point. You’re trying to tell me that a liberal version of Genocide is somehow better than a Republican version of genocide and that I should try to enthusiastically make one happen.

          Why do you think it’s so hard for others to pull the lever for Harris despite that? Harris is part of an administration that helped kill family members of my neighbors. If you can’t see why this makes it hard, I can’t help you.

          • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            Because Russia has a long history of propping up third party distractors, especially those who are friendly to Russia’s causes, and another of their tools, useful idiots and bought-and-paid for bad actors (note: Mods, not accusing THIS poster of this, but you can’t disagree such people exist and operate here on Lemmy and on other forums across the Internet) spread bullshit across the web to convince people that the Shitgibbon with his plans to directly enable his fellow authoritarian shithead to exterminate and/or subjugate the Palestinians AND his plans to let Russia do the same RE: Ukraine AND his plans to bring that same subjugation/extermination to LGBTQ+, non-Christian, minority, female, and non-Conservative populations HERE IN THE USA is somehow better than letting Team Biden/Harris have 4 more years.

            You don’t like me calling that out? Well, you can fuck right off because I’m not going to stop.

            • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              Not everyone who opposes Biden’s policies on Gaza is a Russian plant. We know third parties are not viable, but we also want to pressure Democrats. This isn’t hard, and you thinking this is all Russian conspiracy and that you wanna curse out your political allies is a Feinstein-level of out-of-touch rambling. Peace.

    • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Having said that there is no hope for Gazans from US since both the parties are bought and paid for by the Israelis.

      American political parties are not in charge of Israel. Believe it or not, Israel has their own elections and elects their own parties.

      Maybe it’s not that both parties are paid off, but that stopping a still-young and flawed democracy from being swallowed up by a far right religious dictatorship sworn to kill every Jew in the middle east in the name of a new Islamic Caliphate, is an issue with resounding bipartisan support.

      Oh, you know what else it could be, has a lot of bipartisan support? Not stabbing our allies in the back, just on principle.

      Huh, maybe not everything you find revulsive is a Jewish conspiracy to control on the world.

      • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Anything said against Israel is not anti Semitic. It is just realistic.

        Instead of being swallowed by islamic caliphate, the ethnostate of Israel is controlled by a far right, islamophobic government.

        Preventing world recognized genocide is not stabbing allies in the back.

      • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        swallowed up by a far right religious dictatorship sworn to kill every Jew in the middle east in the name of a new Islamic Caliphate

        oof, that’s quite the Islamophobic take there

          • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Why would I entertain your a-historical reactionary bullshit with a substantive response? If I said ‘Hezbollah was justified in firing missiles into Tel Aviv everyday because Israel is a blood-thirsty religious apartheid state dead-set on killing every Muslim in the middle east in the name of a ‘Judeo-Christian crusade’’, would you see it as an honest attempt at good-faith debate?

            Of course not.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m honestly doubtful Trump would make any additional difference considering Biden didn’t do anything to reduce Israel’s insanity. He’d still have to let congress pass the big stuff, and Biden approved every single smaller sale bar holding up one shipment temporarily.

    Everyone keeps saying “yeah but Trump would be worse for Gaza” just because he did the whole embassy thing, but this really looks as if it’s maxed out.

    Even from a purely utilitarian perspective assuming this is true, I’d rather take my final stand and be wiped out than to be continuously subjected to essentially warcrime torture for the remainder of my life.

    Harris already made it clear that her policy with Israel won’t change. Her campaign decided that the amount of votes in this group do not matter (which I completely disagree with), which is why she barred them from talking at the DNC, despite the fact that they were offering to endorse her. She went all in on the AIPAC funding and lobby though.

    This is basically their last desperate call to get the DNC to change their minds (probably won’t happen), so I guess I’ll see you all in r------- red Michigan this year.

    • rsuri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Everyone keeps saying “yeah but Trump would be worse for Gaza” just because he did the whole embassy thing, but this really looks as if it’s maxed out.

      It’s a lot more than that. Trump also gave a Medal of Freedom, the highest civilian honor, to Miriam Adelson, a billionaire heiress who is actually more extremist even than Netanyahu. She openly opposes Palestinian statehood, wants Israel to annex the West Bank, and wrote an op-ed saying critics of Israel are “our enemies” and “dead to us”. She gave Trump money, so she owns him. The US can do a lot more than send a few weapons to Israel, and this rabid extremist billionaire will ask Trump for everything she can get. And he will do what she says.

  • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    3 months ago

    Unsurprising. While people opposed to any criticism of the democrats’ self defeating and inhumane policy on this issue like to pretend it’s all a pro Trump psy op, it’s actually more of a DON’T SUPPORT GENOCIDE YOU EVIL FUCKS type of thing.

    But for the dems it’s fine because the electoral college has the whole country by the balls I guess ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ who are you going to vote for dumb dumb? Orange hitler? Spoiler candidates? Lol didn’t think so, send the bombs boyos

      • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        What makes you say that? Is there something I’m missing?

        The Uncommitted group “opposes a Donald Trump presidency, whose agenda includes plans to accelerate the killing in Gaza while intensifying the suppression of anti-war organizing,” the statement continues. Additionally, the group is “not recommending a third-party vote in the Presidential election, especially as third party votes in key swing states could help inadvertently deliver a Trump presidency given our country’s broken electoral college system.”

        I agree with them. Including about this:

        Vice President Harris’s unwillingness to shift on unconditional weapons policy or to even make a clear campaign statement in support of upholding existing U.S. and international human rights law has made it impossible for us to endorse her

        Although I would say obviously people should still vote for her because the political system is broken.

        I was responding to this “news” because it is what many of us have been saying the whole time, only to be met with accusations that this must mean we think trump is better. Obviously he would be much worse for this and everything else. But that doesn’t excuse the dems position.

        • barsquid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          I don’t disagree with any of that. I didn’t read your previous comment as opposing the system in a productive way. The system is garbage but we still have to participate or it becomes worse.

          You will likely get the accusations anywhere you are omitting the part about voting for Harris despite opposing an endorsement. That is due to the prolific MAGA campaigners on here urging people to vote third party and using this issue as the reason.

          • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            You will likely get the accusations anywhere you are omitting the part about voting for Harris despite opposing an endorsement.

            Yeah absolutely. But I don’t really see why anyone should need to add a voting disclaimer if they are criticising the government’s support for a genocide. People can downvote all they want, some things are just more important than party politics.

            That is due to the prolific MAGA campaigners on here urging people to vote third party and using this issue as the reason.

            Yeah I’m sure there are such people and they can get fucked. But in my experience the people receiving these accusations mainly just don’t want the government to support Israel unconditionally. But as you said, without the disclaimer, these people are accused of a bunch of stuff.

            Is it really so hard for people to believe that others actually just care about preventing mass murder? The fact someone can say something like that and get many responses talking about Trump and the electoral college system rather than acknowledging the legitimacy of the problem being raised is truly disgusting to me.