The article mentions Utah as a state where the slavery exception was removed from the constitution. This is true, but we’ve fucked it up in typical Utah fashion. The state constitution now reads as:
Article I, Section 21. [Slavery and involuntary servitude forbidden – Limitation.] (1) Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude shall exist within this State. (2) Subsection (1) does not apply to the otherwise lawful administration of the criminal justice system.
If there’s a condition on whether slavery is acceptable, then it’s not “abolished.” God, our legislature is such an embarrassing clown car…
EDIT: I did some more research on this because it was bugging me. I looked at the language of the 2020 amendment, an independent analysis of the amendment text, and arguments made in favor of the amendment. Based on that, I believe that the exception is trying to ensure that we can still put people in jail, not that we’re allowed to use them as slave labor when they’re in jail. I think it’s also supposed to make it possible for people in jail to participate in work programs if they want.
With that being said, I think it’s a fucking sloppy piece of work. The text as written would be easily “misinterpreted” by someone who stands to make a financial gain from slave labor. I don’t know who authored this amendment, but I feel that they did a bad job.
Not sure if this will be a good year for this topic but I hope so. Seems like there might be a sort of “law and order” sentiment among the voters this year. I’m a little worried about it, honestly.
California sounds great, if only I could afford to live there
You could move to Baker, problem is then ya live in Baker.
The Guardian - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for The Guardian:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this sourceSearch topics on Ground.News
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/oct/04/california-prop-6-prison-slavery-election