• Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Okay, The Nation. Have fun sticking to your single-issue when the freedom of expression means praising Dear Leader or else be threatened of being shut down by the next administration.

    Oh and Israel gets not just tacit permission, but outward encouragement to commit genocide from the USA, many thanks to sticking to your principles. Neutrality and enlightened centrism win the day.

  • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    We do not support Donald Trump, but to champion Harris at this moment is to ignore the atrocities that are being carried out with weapons supplied by the Biden-Harris administration.

    Everyone with a functioning brain should vote for Harris. Everyone with a functioning moral core should criticise her every single day until she changes course on this. Just because Trump lowers the bar so much doesn’t mean it’s ok to roll around with him in the mud.

    • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Voters have absolutely zero impact on what politicians do. There won’t be any criticizing that’s going to get them to change their mind, even fucking Biden wouldn’t drop out until the money stopped flowing.

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I have a soul - you’re being an immature dummy and, for your principles, you’re willing to sacrifice the lives of Palestinians and women who need reproductive healthcare.

        If you really give a shit about Palestinians you’d prioritize their lives over your moral purity - if you chose not to vote for Harris you’re casually disregarding their lives.

        Don’t be a dummy.

      • seabromd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 month ago

        This only makes sense if the alternative would actually oppose the genocide… They will not … So then you’re getting the genocide plus all the other problems.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Nobody in the US is actively committing genocide. You can stop with that bullshit right now.

        Netanyahu and Likud are the ones pulling the triggers, it’s absolutely fair to blame them.

      • Dkarma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Simple game theory should. Congrats on being worse than Harris cuz you’re empowering trump.

  • BassTurd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Only a real fucking idiot that wants the genocide to worsen won’t vote for Harris. It’s not a hard choice at all really.

    “But but but Harris supports the genocide”. Maybe if you live under a rock and don’t understand how politics and elections work that’s a valid argument.

    A non vote for Harris is a vote for genocide escalation, and the likely deaths and suffering of millions more. Only a real cunt would be in that category.

  • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    No problem. She can have mine, and that of others who think like me, while the rest of the idiots can whine about why they allowed the orange shite back into the white house again.

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago
    The Nation - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for The Nation:

    Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that The Nation is generally reliable. In the “About” section of their website, they identify as progressive. Most editors consider The Nation a partisan source whose statements should be attributed. The publication’s opinion pieces should be handled with the appropriate guideline. Take care to ensure that content from The Nation constitutes due weight in the article and conforms to the biographies of living persons policy.


    MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America


    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/kamala-harris-counter-endorsement/

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    She doesn’t deserve the endorsement of anyone. If people wanted to vote for a right wing authoritarian. They would vote for the real right wing authoritarian, not the person posing as one.