• Azzu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      From the link of this post that you could have clicked on:

      Twitch specifies this is conditional: you’re allowed to discuss the political movement of that name, but not “attack or demean another individual or group of people on the basis of their background or religious belief.”

  • wpb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    17 days ago

    The same way I don’t think we should capitulate to framing “cracker” as a slur, or to framing “black lives matter” as a racist thing to say, I don’t think we should capitulate to framing things like “from the river to the sea” or “zionist” as antisemitic.

    But, as a thought experiment, let’s indulge in this doublespeak trash. What is a good alternative? So far I’ve got:

    • Israeli colonizers
    • Jewish supremacists
    • genocidal sacks of shit
    • Israeli apartheidists
    • Isreal expansionists
    • Israeli warmongerers
    • people in favor of the genocide and apartheid committed by Israel (in full, every time you need to say zionist)
    • modern day nazis
    • zionazis (technically not zionist!)

    So all of this liberal crybaby nomenclature trash aside, I actually do think “zionist” is in itself a fairly useless term for the Israeli apartheid question (as Norman Finkelstein and Judith Butler do too). While one faction of zionism pursued the nakba and massacres from fairly early on, and while this faction has been quite successful, there are other notions of zionism which do not entail murdering children or colonizing a country. When Netanyahu and Chomsky can both legitimately refer to themselves as zionists, I think it’s clear that zionism is too broad a term to be useful in the current ongoing genocide and the ethnic cleansing that has been going on for the better part of a century.

  • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    Calling zionism what it is shouldn’t be discouraged with dog whistles masquerading as conduct policies.

    At the same time I’d like to remind folks that not all Jewish people subscribe to Zionism.

    There are a couple Jewish lead organizations that fight for the freedom of Palestine and have been very critical of Israel for many years.

    Jewish Voices for Peace is one group. I wonder how they’d feel about Twitches new policy. I’m genuinely curious what their opinion would be.

    Edit - corrected Jewish Voices for Peace

    • anarchotoothbrushist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      17 days ago

      At the same time I’d like to remind folks that not all Jewish people subscribe to Zionism.

      Further to this, the majority of zionists are christians.

      • zqps@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        I know there’s a lot of Christians involved but how do we know it’s the majority? Young Israelis are raised largely around Zionist propaganda after all.

        • wpb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          17 days ago

          There’s about 100 million evangelical christians in the US, and a LifeWay poll in 2017 showed that about 80% essentially considered themselves zionists. That’s 80 million. There’s 15.8 million jews worldwide. So the non-Jewish zionists outweigh Jewish zionists by a fair margin. Heck, they outweigh the zionist and the non-zionist jews taken together by a beefy margin, even.

            • wpb@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              17 days ago

              oh no, statistics that challenge my world view! Quick, let’s not look into it at all and move the goal posts!

              Could you at least try to engage in this discussion? Or maybe come up with any evidence supporting your world view?

              • zqps@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                16 days ago

                A different definition of the term isn’t a different worldview. Also, not immediately spinning every exchange into an exhaustive debate isn’t a critical character flaw. Unlike being an insufferable ass about not getting the amount of attention you apparently feel entitled to.

                Though I would take look at that poll about 80% of Christians being “essentially” Zionists if you’d link to it.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          17 days ago

          the majority of zionists are christians.

          us braindead fundies are numbered in dozens of millions and they largely support Zionism.

          in rural US, radio glorifying genocide… it is very disturbing.

    • Azzu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      If you had looked at the link of this post, you would have read:

      Twitch specifies this is conditional: you’re allowed to discuss the political movement of that name, but not “attack or demean another individual or group of people on the basis of their background or religious belief.”

      I.e. nothing is masqueraded here as long as they keep to this. This seems to be a reasonable policy. I’ve seen a couple of instances of people being derogatorily called zionists just for supporting the people of current Israel not being pushed away out of their now decades-old homes, which is hard to still call Zionist if they don’t support any further expansion and any offensive military action.

      There’s almost never anything gained to use “Zionist” on someone as if saying “asshole”.

      • Anas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        Twitch specifies this is conditional: you’re allowed to discuss the political movement of that name, but not “attack or demean another individual or group of people on the basis of their background or religious belief.”

        Zionist is a political term, it has nothing to do with one’s background or religious belief.

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          You’re entirely right.

          But see if the political view is only held by members or a certain religious group (even if not all members of said religion accept said political thought), it’s easy to conflate it, so that you can ban anyone opposing said political thought based on “they’re discriminating against me because of my religion”.

          Fuck twitch.

            • Dasus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              17 days ago

              Well, I guess, but… you could argue that Zionists are mostly seen to be purely Jewish due to the nature of the movement.

      • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        17 days ago

        I guess my pessimistic lens is a little strong and I generally don’t trust large companies to act in good faith. So maybe I’m over scrutinizing here and being a bit of a curmudgeon.

        I think your perspective is fair, and it’s likely this is akin to a high school faculty dealing with some random word or idea becoming a meme of sorts and causing problems. So they have to write some new rule that sounds ridiculous or weird.

        It sucks there’s so much racism and bigotry driving forces in the world that it’s hard to not be dubious of everything. You always kinda wonder about the actual motivation behind things like this.

        • Azzu@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          I identify myself as a homosexual.

          I’ve heard homo being used in a derogatory way as an insult. That usage should not be tolerated.

          Retarded is just a medical term, yet you can use it as an insult as well.

          That is what this “specification of conditional” aims at. It’s fine to use the word in a descriptive way, you’re just not allowed to go around angrily calling people “fucking zionist”

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      All tech companies eventually enshitify and we would never be able to remember all of them if they all became slurs. Lol

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    It’s great how people are gathering and having discussions under heavily censored platforms owned by billionaries, just amazing.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      17 days ago

      And on top of that, pretty much all the platforms, even all the way down to this one, are censored in at least one increasingly-relevant way.

  • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 days ago

    How do you people propose to call them? Expansionists? Colonialists? Genocidists?

  • lorty@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    17 days ago

    Waiting for the free-speech absolutists to boycott twitch for this (they won’t)

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 days ago

      One of the orchestrators of this whole thing, Destiny, defends child porn and the use of slurs.

      Ironic is putting it lightly.

    • wertyuiop@feddit.rocks
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      17 days ago

      It’s their goal. They want to conflate jewishness and israel because they need the world to be antisemitic.

      Otherwise people would just leave.

  • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    17 days ago

    They already banned a swathe of pro-palestinian political streamers in the run up to the US election, so this is likely retroactive reasoning.

  • RiQuY@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    17 days ago

    Friendly reminder that selfhosted streaming exists (Owncast) or online alternatives like PeerTube.