• ddplf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The CEO is however a robber baron operating at the times of peace, using different methods but achieving the same end - people dying, most often miserably. I don’t see how that’s better.

        • ddplf
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I’m sorry, but I don’t think it’s so radical not grieving after a person who is the head of a corporation of which sole purpose is to take money from people for a promise of payout when things go dire, and then refusing when the times comes, leaving them exposed at the most miserable time of their entire lives…

          Insurance companies are not banks, they don’t take deposits and return them to you with huge margin when you need it most. They would be operating at massive loss for each client.

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            5 hours ago

            You don’t have to grieve but think you should to sensitive to fellow humans no matter if they run a company that ruins your life.

            • ddplf
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              4 hours ago

              That would be too radical for me, sorry

    • zergtoshi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Right, but still a person who had a part in making the lives of lots of people miserable or unnecessarily short.
      If a CEO isn’t responsible for the policies of the company they’re CEO of, why would you need a CEO in the first place?