• NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The other lesson is that no matter how far you walk in life, it’s just the same background looped over and over again.

  • _lilith@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    You gotta know the movie rule tho. If it’s a movie, animated or not the monster is real

  • lemonaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The bad guys in every episode aren’t monsters, they’re liars.

    In reality, they’re both.

  • egrets@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Life is full of mysteries, yeah
    But there are answers out there
    And they won’t be found
    By people sitting around
    Looking serious
    And saying ‘Isn’t life mysterious?’
    Let’s sit here and hope
    Let’s call up the fucking Pope
    Let’s go watch Oprah
    Interview Deepak Chopra

    If you wanna watch telly, you should watch Scooby Doo
    That show was so cool
    Because every time there was a church with a ghoul
    Or a ghost in a school
    They looked beneath the mask and what was inside?
    The fucking janitor or the dude who ran the waterslide
    Because throughout history
    Every mystery
    Ever solved
    Has turned out to be
    Not magic

    - Tim Minchin, Storm

  • Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    8 hours ago

    And then they undermined that message that one time they made the zombies real, and probably a couple other times I don’t remember.

    • MudMan@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Everything you liked as a kid seems woke and politicized when you were a tiny kid because tiny kids are too dumb to think on purpose.

      I’ll say, though, I was old enough to be mad at the James Gunn-written Scooby adaptations because they couldn’t resist doing actual supernatural stuff and lost this angle entirely.

      And then those got reappraised as not being garbage when THOSE kids grew up and a lot of the newer stuff went with that angle as well.

      You being too dumb to think on purpose doesn’t mean you’re not learning, for better and worse. I used to think that wasn’t the case when I was a kid because I was too dumb.

        • MudMan@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Well, you’d be surprised. Going through uni I definitely got to see a lot of left-of-centre young adults get through semiotics and discouse analysis courses and have an absolute fit at the realization that a bunch of the cool stuff they liked as kids had a clear right-wing bent.

          I mean, they all had a lot of time to get attached to Back to the Future and Die Hard before they were forced to think about it too hard. Learning! Twice!

            • MudMan@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              8 hours ago

              I would lie if I said I wasn’t baiting a little bit, but man, see? Cuts both ways.

              Die Hard is extremely obvious. I mean, the whole movie is about this guy finding that his wife suddenly has a job, makes more money than he does and may be attractive to smarter, richer people, but then fate conspires to make his blue collar streetsmarts and prepper attitudes having him save the day for the foppish yuppies. The entire movie ends when they throw the eurotrash rich thief out of a building by literally unshackling Holly from the bonus gift her company job gave her, then wrapping her up in a comfort blanket and taking her home. The movie also finds time to clearly establish that all public servants are idiots except for street level cops.

              Back to the Future is subtler, but also pretty straightforward. Kid thinks life with middle class parents in the 80s sucks, goes back to the 50s, which turn out to be as ideal as expected but also somehow cooler in a very 80s kind of way, teaches his dad self-assertion and comes back to the future to find he’s now upper class and has a 4x4. It’s a lot less hardcore, but the reagonomics are running underneath the whole thing. I’d take that it’s accidental, because the same team went much more leftward in Roger Rabbit, so I think it’s just that a lot of the cultural white noise of the mid-80s is baked into the assumptions. And the nostalgia is a massive driving force of conservatism anyway. BTTF is idolizing this “fifteighties” imagery the same way Grease was to suggest there is a perfect past to return to. Kind of in the way Stranger Things and a bunch of other stuff does to the 80s.

              That’s maybe the most fun part of breaking down BTTF. The iconic slivers of the film set in the 80s are supposed to show it being run down, realistic and disappointingly drab by comparison.

              Also, Lybian terrorists stealing plutonium but being so incompetent they get tricked by Doc and defeated by Marty. That’s a very time-specific one, like Rambo praising the Taliban.

                • MudMan@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  I don’t know, man, Die Hard is pretty far out there.

                  The Rambo and Rocky sequels are what they are as well. They are almost naive about it in a way that supports ironic appreciation, though.

                  Dirty Harry tracks, but that’s back in the early 70s. I never went deep enough into the sequels to see if it got really bad down the line.

                  I’ve heard some stuff about Field of Dreams, but I don’t think I’ve watched that in one sitting.

                  I don’t know it’s often the action stuff. Your Commandos and Death Wishes and so on. Does stuff like Red Dawn and Invasion USA even count as “crypto”? Those are pretty overt.

                  If you let me break the time frame I will say that I think The Incredibles flies over people’s heads as being aggressively conservative. Forrest Gump used to, but I think people got wise to it over time. Another Zemeckis joint, too. Maybe it’s Roger Rabbit that was the accident.

          • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I mean, they all had a lot of time to get attached to Back to the Future and Die Hard

            What’s so right wing about those? Honestly, it’s been a while but I don’t really remember any clear examples.

            • MudMan@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Somebody else just asked, so see above.

              BTTF I can get, but Die Hard flying under people’s radar is always surprising.

                • MudMan@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  Hah! It happens. That’s when the shock comes.

                  I’ll say that it’s still a great movie. I love it. That’s something modern culture warriors just won’t acknowledge. You can engage with a piece of art or entertainment pushing politics you despise. It’s fine.