• FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    2 months ago

    Scientific American offering up one data point as a miracle cure for a whole range of conditions. But it’s not even selling sunlight as the cure, which is implied by the title, but artificial light paid for by your insurance.

    This is trash.

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Well this is certainly shocking since most of the drugs given to autoimmune patients are in classes that raise cancer risks by multitudes, and prohibit patients from exposure to direct sunlight. Same with chemo patients.

    • ignirtoq@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      The article talks about “Ultraviolet (UV) light boxes, which emit only a narrow bandwidth of light that is not linked to skin cancer,” so it’s possible the UV treatment and the drugs can be combined.

  • afk_strats@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s a really promising idea but the article only presents one use case…

    Also it’s hard not to meme this. Like “what else will they think of? Touching grass…”

    • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Artificial grass. The headline says sunlight but the contents are all about artificial light. So it would need to be fake grass to be consistent

    • Krudler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I am actually so happy that you posted this information!

      I have been a lifetime sufferer of really bad psoriasis… I’ve worked heavily with my dermatologist, who is wonderful!

      We’ve had the very frank conversation that yes technically no sun exposure is the right move from a skin cancer standpoint… But that requires you to ignore all the deleterious effects of getting insufficient sun in other aspects of our body health.

      That is to say, it’s being shown that humans need a shitload of sun to stay healthy! The whole “no amount of sun is healthy” concept is a massive lie at worst, and a phenomenally myopic view at best

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The natural sun isnt the same as it once was. We fucked up the atmosphere.

      Edit: downvoted? On the science Lemmy? Wow, .world really is anti science trash now?

      • Krudler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s because of your pointless off topic attempt at getting virtue points.