• MossBear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wish this had a pen. I’m waiting for a Linux tablet that can be used with Krita.

    • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not exactly a tablet, but Ive been using an old Thinkpad Yoga for Krita with its built in wacom pen. Got it used for like $150

      • LoafyLemon@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        XP-PEN Deco Mini 7, works out of the box with the generic kernel driver as well. Posting in case someone’s looking for one.

    • Richard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well there’s always the option to buy something like a Samsung Galaxy Book3 360. It’s a laptop that comes with an AMOLED touchscreen, a 360° hinge and the S-Pen. You can put a GNU/Linux distribution on it and enjoy free/libre and open-source software with a tablet-like user experience while keeping your integrated keyboard and touchpad (it’s the best of both worlds!), and the S-Pen is amazing and works on Linux because it uses standardised Wacom protocols. They’re not inexpensive though.

      • MossBear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not a bad idea. Thanks for the recomendation! I had forgotten that s-pens use wacom tech.

    • Kingofthezyx@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not exactly the same, but current and last gen Samsung tablets can run Krita. I’ve never used it on desktop though so I don’t know if the Android version is worse in some way but I’ve had a great time with it on my Tab S8 Ultra

  • anlumo@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why would you want a tablet with an Intel processor? Especially with Linux, which unlike Windows, runs perfectly fine on ARM.

    • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Does everything run on ARM? Steam, Wine, stuff like that? Are the power optimisations as good on Linux/ARM as on x86? Not saying they aren’t, but I imagine on a laptop replacement thingy x86 makes sense due to this kind of support.

        • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          The processors do, that doesn’t mean the desktop Linux distributions are well optimised for it. The available Linux phones have garbage battery life and a bunch of other issues.

        • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          This isn’t necessarily as true as it once was. X86 has made a lot of ground in power efficiency and ARM has made a lot of ground in performance

          • areyouevenreal@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Intel chips are still quite hot and use older process nodes which are less efficient. They have been pushing performance over efficiency recently as well. If this was AMD hardware on N5 I would agree with you, but sadly it isn’t.

            • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s true in general, but Intel Atom is quite promising IIRC, and efficiency cores + improvements to their fabs should only continue to improve the situation.

              I’m not saying the old logic of “ARM is efficient, x86 is fast” isn’t still true, but it’s becoming less true, and they’re kind of converging to be similar chips but with different starting points (i.e., the needs are becoming more similar, and the differences are becoming lesser).

              • areyouevenreal@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m not saying the old logic of “ARM is efficient, x86 is fast” isn’t still true

                Okay then I will say it. Apple Silicon is almost as fast per core than Intel and AMD. I am not talking just about x86 vs ARM in general because that’s a fools errand. I am talking about Intel. That’s also not an Atom chip, they don’t make Atom anymore. Sure it is made of E cores but those are several generations removed from the Atom chips. It would actually make more sense imo if they used the 8 core version of that chip.

      • anlumo@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not really the use case for a tablet. It’d be nice to run Android apps, but I think that’s possible on Linux on ARM.

        • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          As long as something is running a desktop OS, anything is a use case for it. Maybe that’s exactly the point why it’s x86. It has a 12" inch sceeen after all, so it’s not like it’s just a mini 8" tablet you take to bed to watch vids before sleeping.

  • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Someone knows something like this with (possibly color) E-Ink?

    Or maybe an E-Reader where you can go out of the reader application and install Android/Linux apps (e.g. you can “hack” them without much trouble)?

  • Sagrotan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Paid 200 for an old surface, it literally races with arch. No problems whatsoever. But libreboot would be nice.

  • Maharashtra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    $498

    optional keyboard cover for an extra $101.

    Ah, I understand. It’s an attempt to replicate Steve “unwashed” Jobs’ strategy, where buying overpriced stuff makes you BETTER, DIFFERENT and UNIQUE. Am I right?

    • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      $500 with a keyboard would be acceptable for a device like that. But the retail price is given as $700 plus $100 for the keyboard. That’s pretty steep.

      • const_void@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m all for paying a little more for a machine that puts Linux and FOSS first. Dell and Lenovo are cheaper, sure, but you’re supporting the Windows/closed source ecosystem.

    • fuggadihere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you think it is overpriced?

      I was doing the configure your device option but I have no clue if the ”additional language” is the external keyboard. It has to be(?) :)

      • Kingofthezyx@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        It looks like they’re combining two options into one, like instead of having you choose “optional keyboard Y/N” and then “keyboard language”, you just choose them both at once, like “optional keyboard and if so, what language?”

      • terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        From another post about this yesterday, I found in the specifications section of their website, a “what’s in the box”: No mention of a keyboard. So the base model has no keyboard. So ya, choosing the layout is also opting for the keyboard, and, adding an extra ~$100 to the price.

      • Maharashtra@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you think it is overpriced?

        Given its capabilities and the fact that you can buy used MS notebook/360 device for such a price? Of course.