Welp…

    • nocturne@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      156
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Hopefully it has success at breaking us from our failed two party system, while at the same time the party itself fails (and costs him lot of money in the process).

      • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        4 months ago

        Breaking the US from the failed 2-party system would require replacing first-past-the-post voting with at least ranked choice, if not a proportional system like Hare-Clarke, and probably scrapping the Electoral College altogether. Which may require constitutional amendments, or at least a partisan Supreme Court sympathetic to more democracy that would Chewbacca-defence it through regardless of legality.

    • 🇨🇦 tunetardis@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      ·
      4 months ago

      Best case scenario is it will split the right wing vote. In Canada, we’re used to it going the other way with conservatives taking advantage of a split left.

      • NateNate60@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Washington Post columnists said it would probably just capture the “Never Trumper” moderate Republican voters who currently begrudgingly vote Democratic because they understand that the Republican Party is nominating only yes-men and fascists.

          • NateNate60@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            4 months ago

            Especially not their opinion column but I’m just posting here because it’s interesting to see what the neoliberals think about it and it’s a good discussion point

            • dragontamer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Washington Post is Murdoch connected as of December 2023 (new leader and Bezos began to flex his muscles at the paper). I hesitate to call it neoliberal. It’s moved right of that.

              • NateNate60@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                If you actually bother to read it (regularly, not just once or twice on selected columns that you saw posted online), you would not think that. The opinion column is very neoliberal with a hint of libertarianism.

                • dragontamer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  I was an active subscriber who regularly read WashPo.

                  Ruth Marcus, Alexandra Petri and a whole slew of other liberals have left the post after the 2024 election and various tampering by Jeff Bezos. Or have you not noticed the change of writers yourself??

                  The ones who remained are hardly NeoLiberal, but overall have shifted farther and farther right. Jeff Bezos killing a few key OpEds have made it clear to the liberals that they are no longer welcome at the Washington Post.


                  Or what? You gonna try to convince me that Hugh Hewitt is a liberal or some shit?

        • Kühlschrank@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          4 months ago

          The Dems leaned hard on the never Trumpers for votes last year and you can see where that got them. Elon can have them.

        • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          4 months ago

          Republican never Trumper that doesn’t vote GOP is likely vanishingly small. They all fall in line.

          It might siphon off the GOP voters that begrudingly fell in line because they bought the Communist Kamala or something, or the ones that needed to see Trump disaster a second time.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Same with the USA, the US Green Party is funded by Conservative PACs such as Badger Values. If there were left unity then the 8 million people who showed up for Biden 2020 would have shown up for Harris 2024, but a lot of people are convinced the DNC aren’t left enough and that primary elections are shams.

    • dalekcaan@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      4 months ago

      I want him to split the GOP vote. Basically just a Jill Stein that believes his own swill.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah…

      At best, it splits the MAGAt vote, making Dems a clear winner.

      At worst, it takes some GenZ dipshit votes away from Dems and causes chaos.

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            4 months ago

            Cut the age blame crap. They did nothing different than the rest of our society. Don’t let our generations fall for the same tactics as the generations before us. Our war needs to be a class war, not some stupid “young people are lazy nowadays” bullshit that EVERY high horse ignorant person has said for the last 200 years. Do the youth a favor and look upon anyone who singles them out and trys to separate us with disgrace. Respect is a 2 way street. Let’s be better

            • dragontamer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              You youngsters will blame the next generation as well. You just aren’t old enough to see the pattern yet.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I think your beef should be with all men then. As Trump voters increased in men by age. So you could factually say Gen Z men were the least likely to vote for Trump as well

        • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          All/most of them, or a few mediagenic alt-right examples the press can trot out as proof of “young men want fascism and Latin Mass” when they run out of MAGA-hatted Ordinary Americans in flyover-state diners?

        • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          You should check those numbers, because it went 51% to Harris. Splitting that means good things for Dems though. Dilution through stupidity.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Success means a split of the Republicans, because the vast majority of Dems aren’t going to follow Elon after these last few months.

    • billwashere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      If it splits the republican party and removes the old white billionaires from the dems than I’m 100% for it.