• Black616Angel@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Apple will have a USB-C connector (capable of fast charging tech), but will only support slow 5V charging (for most non-apple chargers?)…

          • black0ut@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s faster than network data transfer. I don’t know exactly how fast can WiFi go, but most if the time it can’t even exceed 1Gbps. However, USB-C 4 V2 can reach 80 Gbps, and isn’t all that affected by electromagnetic interference.

            For transfering a few photos, you won’t notice a difference. But if you need to back up a 256 GB phone, the difference in speed is actually big.

            • flashgnash@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I guess so, I don’t see much reason why I’d need to back up my whole phone in this day and age though, photos documents and notes are all backed up through syncthing/Google photos and that runs in the background constantly so not like I’m waiting

              Contacts, installed apps and I believe some settings are backed up to my Google account and will follow me without even thinking about it

              I guess game save data but personally I don’t play games on my phone anymore anyway so that’s not a big deal for me

              Could quite happily wipe my phone tomorrow and be back up and running with all my data within 30 mins max and have never needed to plug it in

              • black0ut@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Most people do what you say, but there are places where you don’t have a stable internet connection, or people who like to keep their storage offline.

                I don’t mean to say that there are no alternatives to a fast cable, or that most people should use it. But it’s a feature that comes with the cable, and there shouldn’t be someone trying to cap it just for profit.

                The controllers for the communication protocol probably cost something like 8 cents, Apple shouldn’t screw their customers over that little cost. Even with a feature most people won’t use, because it’s nice knowing that you have the possibility to use it if you need to.

                • flashgnash@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Oh yeah I’m not trying to argue they are justified in doing this in the slightest don’t get me wrong apple sucks for decisions like this

    • moitoi@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is wrong. The iPhone must comply with Power Delivery at 100W and must use USB-C. It’s the EU reglementation. Now,the trick can be they don’t follow this outside the EU.

    • Shayeta@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      37
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly, I find this preferable. I only charge at night and a battery that charges slowly lasts longer.

      • LufyCZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not preferable at all.

        They’re purposefully crippling a $1000+ product.

        You’re free to buy a slow charger for $8 on Amazon, there’s tons of solutions for that.

        There’s no solution for garbage hardware

        • ciko22i3@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          my samsung galaxy s10 had an option to turn off fast charging in settings (for wireless too)

        • happyhippo@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Most of Apple users I’ve met master the art of turning Apple’s crap decisions into features and advantages over the competition.

          I lost all faith in those folks being reasonable.

        • TWeaK@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I really wish we had the capability to stop charging early. I’d love to leave my phone plugged in for crazy long periods, but only keep the battery at like 70%. This way it wouldn’t degrade performance from the batteries being left at full charge.

          • Toast@lemmy.film
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Are you sure you don’t already have something like this? My android is a couple years old, but has always let me charge to only 85%

            • TWeaK@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s not a feature commonly found in AOSP ROMs, in my experience.

              • Toast@lemmy.film
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s unfortunate, I guess. I mean, even though I do have my phone set to only charge up to 85%, I don’t really know if this is battery protective or not.

                Is it?

                I just enabled the option because the description of the feature claimed it to be. I haven’t researched this at all

                • TWeaK@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yes it should be, somewhat anyway. Primarily batteries wear out through use, both charging and discharging - if your phone is plugged in but not charging, then your phone is running off mains and the battery isn’t being used. However, batteries also wear out over time, albeit much more slowly. Manufacturer’s typically recommend keeping batteries in long term storage at around 70% to minimise this effect. If you’re always plugged into mains at 100% charge, then you’re not following this storage recommendation. Leaving it at 100% won’t kill the battery, but its capacity will go down quicker than if left at a lower charge.

        • pufferfischerpulver@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, or just a slow charger next to bed? Who doesn’t have a charter next to bed? Especially a slow one costs nothing.

          Definitely wouldn’t want to give up PD speeds to top up during the day. Well, I would give them up if I didn’t have to top up during the day.

      • hackitfast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you find that preferable, you’d love the Pixel then. You can turn it on and off as you please.

        https://screenrant.com/use-adaptive-charging-pixel-7-how/

        Also if you’re using an official Apple USB-C charging cable on an iPhone, you can expect that it will charge at full speed (overnight or not).

        And if you’re at a friend’s house and they have any other Android phone on Earth, the fast charging cable that they use to resuscitate their own Android phone from 10% to 50% in 15 mins and will take your (much more pricey) iPhone 50 minutes.

        And the overpriced iPhone cable that charges those iPhones fast, will charge any Android phone fast.

        At the minimum, you should understand that you’re the one getting the shit end of the stick. Don’t explain how it’s so convenient for you to get the shit end of the stick, that’s what let’s manufacturers keep getting away with this anti-consumer bullshit.