3% may not sound much but this is on revenue, not profit.

  • majster@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    So they are trying to substitute company profit tax? I just checked with Google and they include VAT on subscription so it doesn’t seem the case that there is no tax.

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    9 hours ago

    companies whose global revenues exceed €750 million, effectively targeting larger U.S. tech companies

    For me the brass-neckedness of this is that as soon as it comes to tax, all the big “U.S.” companies are actually Irish, Bermudan and Caymanian companies.

  • vermaterc@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Might be hard to do, it needs to be approved by president of Poland which is a big fan of Trump (contrary to current government)

  • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    When US DNS servers (and Cloudflare) turn off access to and from Poland, I’ll be interested. Until then, the digital taxes are interesting but empty threats as far as the corps are concerned.

  • First_Thunder@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    This just sounds like higher VAT on large tech companies? Isn’t it a regressive tax?

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Generally (for most countries that do this, I haven’t researched Poland) the point is that traditional (non-digital) companies have always paid import duties, usually much higher than 3%, when goods are physically imported. Digital goods by their nature have effectively been skirting the system for a few decades and paying zero tax, and it’s not good for local businesses to be in a situation where they’re paying a bunch of taxes locally but foreign businesses competing in the same market get to just skip it.

      The $750M requirement is likely because the amount of paperwork required for a small business to correctly calculate, process and pay that tax would be prohibitively expensive for them to sell their service to Polish customers, and they don’t want a situation where small businesses just straight up refuse to sell in Poland.

      • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Exactly this. The whole premise of the tax system is based around the historically correct idea that you need to physically move goods in order to sell them, or physically be somewhere to sell services.

        Companies like google are making buckets of money all over the world, and don’t need to tax a dime most places, because they have no physical presence there. This makes it pretty much impossible to compete with the international behemoths, because they have access to a munch of tax-free revenue, while a startup will typically be centred around wherever they’re based, where they also need to pay taxes.

        • Evil_Incarnate@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 minutes ago

          Not to mention that they say they don’t have to abide by local laws because they aren’t located there.