szmer
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 4 hours ago

Even the NRA is against Trump team plan to ban trans people from owning firearms

www.independent.co.uk

external-link
message-square
30
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • mtf@lemmy.blahaj.zone
130
external-link

Even the NRA is against Trump team plan to ban trans people from owning firearms

www.independent.co.uk

return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 4 hours ago
message-square
30
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • mtf@lemmy.blahaj.zone
Second Amendment groups fire back at Justice Department over potential proposals to block trans people from possessing guns
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    36 minutes ago

    Saw tons of comments the last couple days about “Where’s the NRA to defend trans gun owners huh??!?”

    Well here’s your answer - they said 2nd Amendment rights are for everyone and due process matters. Sometimes being cynical is just hurting your perspective.

    • Mamdani_Da_Savior@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 minutes ago

      Eh if all Trans people where black the NRA would have a different tune.

  • aceshigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 minutes ago

    We’ll see… first it’s trans, then it’s gays, then it’s immigrants and now the nra lost a bunch of customers. They’re thinking big picture.

  • UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    38 minutes ago

    They banned guns when the black Panthers had them.

    • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 minutes ago

      The NRA did not do that. California did that.

  • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    24 minutes ago

    Is the NRA normally transphobic? They defend gun rights. This threatens gun rights.

  • collar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 hours ago

    First shot across the bow at taking guns away from Trump/MAGA dissenters and political opponents. They start with a group they don’t think will incite too many, particularly the generally pro-2A Americans. Next it’ll be gays, then anyone with any connection to antifa, then just Democrats in general.

  • Voyajer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    My sister is looking at rifles now to complement her carry pistol and my friend’s wife has OK’d him getting a handgun for their home from this news.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pink_Pistols

    The Pink Pistols is an LGBTQ gun rights organization in the United States and Canada. Their motto is “Pick on someone your own caliber”.[1]

    I expect that this is kind of up their alley, too.

    • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 minutes ago

      For some reason I always thought their slogan was ‘armed gays bash back.’ Maybe I’ve just seen stickers on things of that slogan paired with Pink Pistols logos a lot.

    • CobblerScholar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      That motto is pretty badass honestly

  • hopesdead@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    How long till they start legally labeling all trans people as “mentally deficient” or declare them all no longer citizens just to bar them from having guns?

  • TheLunatickle@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Well obviously, the only thing the NRA has ever cared about is selling guns. They may couch it it reasons like freedom or safety but the real reason has always just been profits.

    • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Not really, that happened in 1977. See the “history” section: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Rifle_Association?wprov=sfti1

    • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Well, not exactly https://www.history.com/articles/black-panthers-gun-control-nra-support-mulford-act

      Also ironically the gun laws that Republicans poke fun at in California are thanks to Reagan.

      • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 hour ago

        The Mulford act was passed in 1967, when the NRA was still a nonpartisan organization that promoted gun safety and responsible ownership. In 1977 there was an internal coup that replaced the leadership with a group of second amendment extremists (or gun industry shills) who proceeded to turn the NRA hard to the right.

    • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yes that’s the theory of why capitalism good by liberals

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    “without due process”.

    There’s their caveat.

    So if a trans person is arrested and adjudicated as being mentally ill, the NRA is totally OK with that.

    • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 minutes ago

      Due process means a trial. If someone murders a bunch of people the NRA will not necessarily back their 2A rights.

  • return2ozma@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    • octopus_ink@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      The NRA is all "motherfuckers still calling us out about the Mulford Act (which was also Republicans targeting marginalized gun owners), we’re not making that mistake again…"

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Except that one time in California when black people were arming themselves.

    • octopus_ink@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      But, but, due process would take too much time… (that’s what their excuse for ICE is)

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Ah, but this isn’t arbitrary!

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    You’re one of the largest and most powerful lobbying groups in the country. Let’s see them actually put that lobbying to work. Then I’ll believe they’re actually against this.

    • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 minutes ago

      They were, recent events have changed this.

  • ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    “Even” the NRA? They’re the last ones who would support a gun ban.

    • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Nope, the “even” is important. The NRA supports gun control when minority groups are buying guns.

      In contrast to the NRA’s rigid opposition to gun control in today’s America, the organization fought alongside the government for stricter gun regulations in the 1960s. This was part of an effort to keep guns out of the hands of African-Americans as racial tensions in the nation grew. The NRA felt especially threatened by the Black Panthers, whose well-photographed carrying of weapons in public spaces was entirely legal in the state of California, where they were based.

      https://www.history.com/articles/black-panthers-gun-control-nra-support-mulford-act

  • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Where are all those commenters who said the NRA is anti LGBTQ?

    • octopus_ink@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      We’re over here thinking the NRA has noticed how much flack they still get for the Mulford Act, which was the previous time they collaborated to take second amendment rights away from a marginalized group.

News@lemmy.world

news@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !news@lemmy.world

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2.86K users / day
  • 6.69K users / week
  • 12.3K users / month
  • 31.3K users / 6 months
  • 6 local subscribers
  • 32K subscribers
  • 11.5K Posts
  • 151K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • rjc@lemmy.world
  • Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
  • Tenthrow@lemmy.world
  • JonsJava@lemmy.world
  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • jeffw@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.6
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org