Never getting married. Poly too fun.
Even if polyamorous marriage was legal we still would not get married. Marriage is just a contract, it does not ‘prove’ love and ioo takes love out of the relationship.
It currently only stands to create a hierarchy and that is something we cannot abide in our relationships: hierarchy.
At least in Germany, being married also brings tax benefits. Also it makes inheritance easier as well as making decisions for your spouse in case of medical tragedy. Kinda worth tbh.
We’re aware of this and think it is shit quite frankly. People should have that right without a contract and what about if someone is polyamorous and has partners they all want those rights for equally? Guess they’re shit out of luck and if they are married only one person gets that right.
Marriage is a shit system and needs to be done away with for a fairer one where people can be with whoever and however many they want and be assured those ‘rights’ that only a contract grants to one person currently.
Me neither, I actually like being aroace and not having to worry about taking care of a wife and children when I’ve had trauma issues with my dad.
Funny enough, my dad called me an atheist for not wanting to be married. That’s the stupidest comparison I’ve ever seen, I’m not even atheist.
Pulling a Nintendo we see.
What do you mean by pulling a Nintendo?
They legally banned a company from using certain colour combinations recently, so in a way they stopped them using color.
Genki is now also prohibited from using approximations such as ‘Glitch’, ‘Glitch 2’, ‘Genki Direct’ and ‘Genki Indirect’ when promoting its own products, with these of course being very close to Nintendo’s own Switch and Nintendo Direct-related branding.
The accessories manufacturer is also no longer able to use colour schemes in any of its products or packaging which are “confusingly or substantially” similar to Nintendo’s. The court document states: “Namely, red and white, red and blue, green and pink, blue and yellow, purple and orange, pink and yellow, and purple and green.”
Wow, the idea that a court would allow a company to have powers over something that should be in the public domain like color is bizarre.
Also, I’m glad I asked, because I thought pulling a Nintendo might have been a reference to a sex thing and I couldn’t find it on Urban Dictionary.
No, we’re pretty ace and would CW through spoilers sex, we think.
Yeah, it is a ridiculous judgement, which is why we aren’t fans of the courts or law, they often make ridiculous decisions and aren’t about morals or ethics but authority and money.
CW
TIL CW is content warning.
Glad we could help 🙂
