• Turret3857@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I’m all for regulating social media, problem being historically when regulation happens on the internet its for surveillance, not for children. Big tech has lined the pickets of politicians across the globe. Any child can get around UK and US ID laws by finding the right webpage, or using a VPN if they’re a bit older. Unless there’s a massive class shift in our near future we are NEVER going to see regulation that actually helps the parent. It will always be to oppress the lower classes. I understand where you’re coming from and I wish we lived in a world where that could work. Looking around though, I don’t think it ever will.

    • Damaskox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Power and money are easily the biggest goals and wants that lots of people have.

      But I do (still) trust in the goodness of men.
      I’d argue that e.g. an open source system could have a (more) benevolent cause and help someone with these problems without using data (gained) for profit.

      No surveillance (or monitoring) and no data gathering means you cannot see how good/bad something (such as a behavior) is. And in such a situation it’s difficult to come up with tools to help, if there’s “no problem to give help to”.
      (One can always self-monitor e.g. time spent in an app)