• Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    129
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The enlightened centrism is strong in this one. No, the US don’t have a conflict of left vs. right. The conflict is between the right and everyone else. And most of the right are just rubes who think they being part of some kind of movement but in reality are just being fleeced by a bunch of grifters

    • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Not just the right vs. everyone else, the right vs. everyone. The right is also fighting itself.

    • halvar@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I’d say the curve it’s much flatter on the left side. As in right side is shouting tankie, meanwhile there are like 2 tankies and the right wants to set the whole barn on fire to get them both.

    • GreenShimada@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Doesn’t directly bringing up “enlightened centrism” (I assume sarcastically) from a non-right position indicate disdain for centrism? That would be a conflict between whatever you are and both centrists (for not being where you are - right of you, but to them, still left of the Right) and the Right.

      Also, if you’re aware of the Three Percenters and their claim that only 3% of colonial America supported the revolution, it means that even if they’re off by a factor of 10, with 30% for the revolution, and 30% against, it leaves 40%, a plurality of people, who have the sentiment from this meme where they just want to be left alone and not forced against their will into a conflict that indroduces instability and violence to their lives.

      • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 hours ago

        “Enlightened centrism” is not the same as centrism and yes that label is meant to be sarcastic. There are basically two kinds of enlightened centrists. One are right-wingers who want to avoid the social stigma of being far right. The other one are people who close their eyes to the blatant attempt by the right wing to destroy democracy and pretend everything is normal. That’s what basically the corporate media are doing.

  • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Uh… fucking cope hard. The Nazis won’t care about your enlightened centrism when they arrest you for being brown and/or the wrong kind of white.

  • FistingEnthusiast@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    This is bullshit

    Trying to pretend that there’s a concerted far-left effort to create civil war in 'Murica is patently absurd

    Sure, there may be a handful of nutters, but they pale in comparison to the number of far-right who are actively lusting for the blood of the people they hate and fear

    • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      It also tries to downplay political division “in real life”. In real life, the American president is a fascist serial-rapist pedophile directing a masked police force to deport legal residents without due process, illegally deploying the national guard against citizens, and grifting shitcoins and accepting bribes in plain sight.

    • Blackout@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yeah fuck this post. The only ones driving it are the far-right. You’d have to be ignorant to be blaming liberals for the crap going on today.

    • Glide@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Trying to pretend that there’s a concerted far-left effort to create civil war in 'Murica is patently absurd

      Idk man, I spent altogether too much time over in .ml, and now my view on what is “far left” has changed quite drastically. And that group certainly seems hell bent on starting a civil war.

      There are absolutely far more MAGAs, but the tankies are, unfortunately, still far left.

      • FistingEnthusiast@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        If you think lemmy is immune to outside agitators, then you’re kidding yourself

        I’m certain that there are interested groups trying to whip up a few lunatics so that “the left” can be pitted against the right, and blamed for violence, but there’s no doubt that there’s a far larger audience of people in the US who are eager to lean into fascism and spill blood when they are encouraged

  • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    If you think the next US civil war will be fought between Nazis and Marxist-Leninists, you don’t understand American politics very well. The US in 2025 isn’t Stalingrad in 1942.

  • BlueCanoe@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Ideological polarization is actually pretty low among average Americans. It’s mostly felt among the highly politically engaged and politicians. So to that extent, this image seems accurate.

  • passepartout@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    This can be attributed to a method of gaining and maintaining political power called divide and conquer. Poisoning the discourse with targeted manipulation in (social) media, while treating politics as kind of bizarre and grievous reality TV show, where everyone is trying to throw the biggest pile of verbal shit on the other.

  • FridaySteve@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    People need something else to focus on. When everything is politics then politics is everything and it’s stupidly difficult to get people interested in doing anything positive.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I mean, everything is politics whether anybody likes it or not, because politics is just what you get when you have a hierarchical power structure.

      • FridaySteve@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        And this is what I mean. Everything is very much not politics but if you politicize everything then by definition it becomes so. People need to stop doing that.

            • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              59 minutes ago

              Because either you’ll cite a good example and prove me wrong, or you’ll cite a bad example and confirm I’m right. While I doubt you’ll be convinced in the latter case, someone reading this exchange might be, so there’s value to be had in either case.

              • FridaySteve@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                58 minutes ago

                You’ve already asserted that everything is politics whether I like it or not, including this conversation, and since I don’t get involved in “prove me wrong” political conversations on the internet I’ll just exit.

  • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    6 hours ago

    When I have centrist views about anything (not just politics but more trivial matters like pop culture), I’m reluctant to share them online because extremists on both sides interpret you as an extremist on the opposing side

    • BaroqueInMind@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Centrist views such as? grabs popcorn

      No seriously, what do you happen to be sitting on the fence about?

      • jaupsinluggies@feddit.ukOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        That’s still an oversimplification. In reality political opinion varies across a spectrum; it’s not just hard left, hard right, or no opinion. My own views for example are a little left of centre with a leaning towards liberty (i.e. away from authoritarian). So of course I get called a nazi by the hard left, and a tankie by the hard right, both of which are utter nonsense.

        • sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          You’re not wrong. But in your meme you painted all the people calling for civil war as extremes when for a while it was a pretty average sentiment among the right for decades. They were just doing it more quietly twenty years ago

      • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Centrism doesn’t mean sitting on a fence. It means most of the time understanding that both sides are right and wrong at the same time, I often see the problem identified correctly but the solution that is prescribed is absolutely incorrect.

        Here are some centrist positions.

        We need to stop unfettered immigration, so closing the borders is great, locking up and kicking out immigrants who have committed legal offenses is good, and we should expedite that process but we shouldn’t be kidnapping or profiling people. We shouldn’t be giving economic assistance to illegal immigrants. I know it doesn’t happen at the federal level but it does happen at the state level.

        Banning guns won’t solve the violence problem, guns don’t kill people people kill people. American violence is caused by inequality and lack of mental healthcare. Solve that instead of taking guns away.

        We should have higher taxes, universal healthcare and stronger safety nets but also much less regulation because most of it is actually designed to protect the incumbent corporations. Free the markets as much as possible, but never bail out a single corporation that fails, bail out the employees.

        Increasing the minimum wage does nothing.

        Instead of relying on underpaid immigrant labor the US should stop giving cash and tax subsidies to farmers and instead directly subsidize their wages by paying the employees directly. This is my middle of the road solution, we should actually consider nationalization of farms. One of the few things where that could work right now because I think nationalization in general leads to terrible mismanagement. But farms are already inefficient, corrupt and mismanaged and also living on the government tits so we might as well.

        Justifying things as “scientific” when the science is social science and the results are not reproducible is intellectually dishonest, and is rampant in discourse about various topics nowadays. The academia brought upon themselves the mistrust they have garnered. This is good because universities have become job training centers and they were never meant to be that, so maybe we’re due for a little creative destruction.

        I could continue, but I got shit to do.

        • Tippy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          60 minutes ago

          So you’re leaving the US, considering you’re an illegal immigrant here right? I mean, unless you’re indigenous it seems pretty illegal for you to claim any right to live here and boot others out. See the issue with saying people are illegal?

          “Living on the governments tit” is straight up right-winger bullshit. We pay taxes, why the fuck should the government hoard that money and use it on shit that doesn’t benefit the people? That is the ENTIRE FUCKING POINT of a government, to pool resources and skills to better society as a whole.

          You think science is bullshit and that higher education should be “creatively” destroyed. How you think that isn’t fascism is some serious mental gymnastics.

          You could continue, but you know your viewpoint is hard right and you’re too cowardly to stick around and defend your bullshit because your fragile fee-fees will be hurt.

          • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 minutes ago

            Free open borders doesn’t work unless everyone, literally everyone is working on the same legal framework . This could be good long term project for humanity but as it stands right now now, national divisions matter. You can’t have people that weren’t born here overwhelming our nation and getting aid when our own people are suffering economic hardship. The problem with people like you is that you want everything now, and that’s not possible except through extreme violence and often ends up not solving the problems. I would love to be able to remake the system from the top down, but we know that never ends right.

            I don’t think science is bullshit, I think non reroducible experiments are not science. I love science, but the social sciences in the present exist in the same stage of development as medicine was in the Middle Ages. This is a provable fact. Universities need to be centers of knowledge again and not job training centers.

            Like someone pointed out, I said corporations are living off the government tit, that’s a fact. I would prefer if the tit was feeding us instead. I think I made it very clear that I’m pro social safety nets.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            48 minutes ago

            “Living on the governments tit” is straight up right-winger bullshit. We pay taxes, why the fuck should the government hoard that money and use it on shit that doesn’t benefit the people? That is the ENTIRE FUCKING POINT of a government, to pool resources and skills to better society as a whole.

            True on your other points, but here they’re saying the money should be given to employees rather than employers. That’s not rightwing at all; it’s leftwing if anything. I mean it’s the farming version of being anti-corporate welfare.

            • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              20 minutes ago

              Exactly. I think government and corporations exist to generate wealth to benefit society. Right now it exists to benefit corporations.

            • Tippy@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              21 minutes ago

              Sure, that had a semblance of socialism and rational thought to it, but the fact that they spin it as a negative and imply that the government shouldn’t be funding social welfare is pretty clear in showing that they’re too ignorant to actually understand what socialism is.

              Ironic, considering that right-wingers more than any other group rely on sucking the governments tit to survive day to day

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          We need to stop unfettered immigration, so closing the borders is great, locking up and kicking out immigrants who have committed legal offenses is good, and we should expedite that process but we shouldn’t be kidnapping or profiling people.

          This is literally what modern fascism is made of. It always starts with “expediting the process” and “immigrants who committed legal offenses,” but these terms are so malleable that you will relatively soon end up at the kidnapping and profiling stage. And let’s not get into how so-called “unfettered immigration” (which is actually pretty fettered when you look at the process) harms exactly nobody if handled properly, as many examples (e.g. Germany) show.

          but also much less regulation because most of it is actually designed to protect the incumbent corporations.

          What kind of regulation do you want gone?

          Justifying things as “scientific” when the science is social science and the results are not reproducible is intellectually dishonest, and is rampant in discourse about various topics nowadays.

          Social science is science and underpins many aspects of modern society such as urban design. Do you have an example of this in action?

        • Soulg@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Increasing the minimum wage does nothing

          Yeah but the problem with so many right/“centrist” positions is that they’re factually incorrect.