• 0 Posts
  • 11 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 21st, 2023

help-circle

  • #2: what kind of video games? PvP shooters? Grand strategy? Reflex? Detective games? Story/adventure games? Minesweeper? What about non-grid-based trivia/vocabulary games, or open-ended word games without clues, like Scrabble?

    The study says they randomized a subset of the available cognitive games for each game session, could the decreased performance be due to the more sporadic focus on any given skills? Maybe some of the trained skills weren’t especially helpful for memory.

    Or maybe the specific cognitive games they used were just bad? The only detail about them in the study was that they “included memory tasks, matching tasks, spatial recognition tasks, and processing speed tasks.” I don’t know if it’s similar stuff, or how fast they let the game difficulty scale in the study, but I’ve tried a couple of those brain trainer apps. They started out trivial and boring and scaled up slowly, and some of them were basically just brute force puzzles. Not particularly mentally strenuous.

    I don’t see a control group who did neither of them, either. So are both crosswords and cognitive games good but crosswords are a little better? Or do these cognitive games give just as much benefit as watching Family Guy?

    I’m tired of these very specific studies being wildly extrapolated out as “video games bad.” Video games are an extremely diverse medium, it’s like saying reading is bad because you only studied gas station tabloids.








  • It’s even bad for finding something to purchase honestly. I’ll search for a specific part number, and most of the results are other similar but not interchangeable products. No Google I cannot just shove this random other battery pack into my UPS, but thanks anyway.

    I tried searching for airtight drawers and all the results were either airtight or drawers. Only one was both and it was a ten thousand dollar museum specimen cabinet.

    It’s especially terrible if you care about the fiber content of your clothes. Searching for linen or even 100% linen gets me linen blend, linen-look, linen color. 100% wool gets mostly acrylic wool blends. Wool toe socks gets me either wool socks or toe socks but again, not both.

    Plus I can’t block Amazon and Walmart from the results anymore, so that’s a ton of extra junk to filter through manually.



  • I get why a lay person would misunderstand the capabilities of LLMs. They sound like a thinking person should sound, so they treat it like it’s coming from a thinking person.

    But how are all the (presumably) tech-literate Microsoft employees also confused by this? Anyone paying even a little attention should have seen numerous instances of LLMs confidently asserting “facts” that they pulled out of their asses. They are not the right tool for most of the stuff people use a voice/OS assistant for.

    I have to assume it’s the business guys up top hearing the “AI” buzzword and getting horny for capitalism but god damn