Chaotic Entropy

I suppose we can be reassured that the Obscene Yacht industry is still going strong despite the cost of living crisis.

The party trots out a few people to performatively fall on the sword, ones that it doesn’t even impact ultimately, and then they get to pretend that people “broke ranks” when the capitulation comes from the top down.

“Wait, you have to pass this bill? Sweet, the bill now says that you give me all the money.”

All the current powers that be, private and governmental, can heartily agree that allowing the public to have any expectation of privacy or autonomy is highly undesirable.

Ignoring real censorship in the UK because the originating nation of the news source also has censorship… is whataboutism.

The list of things that won’t potentially get you shot in America grows shorter every day.

Behold my new chitinous armour plates!

Anyone can shoot someone in a car at any time, because they’re armed with a deadly weapon, got it.

It’s cool, they will be the first empire to successfully kill all of their plebs once they replace them with AI.

The young desperately want someone, anyone, to actually believe in… and it isn’t Chuck “strongly worded letter” Schumer or some other limp and ineffectual bureaucrat trying to do damage control for the Democrat party.

Shot from behind by federal agents, seems the key missing element of that title.

Awww… I wish I had that level of optimism.

All he has to do is force it in front of people’s eyes instead of Wikipedia. It doesn’t actually have to be useful, just in the way.

Sure.

Well, from Ukraine, though an actual war is occurring. Russia are more than happy to hold elections since they’re rigged anyway.

“Corruption of public morals” is such a shameless name to put on a bill that simply tries to enforce your own morals.

Indeed, it’s not like this was opportunism.

One more indicator that the constitution has been suspended for the foreseeable future.

Not another tragic case of affluenza?!?

Much of the time, AI paraphrases, because it is generating plausible sentences not quoting factual material. Rarely do I see direct quotes that don’t involve some form of editorialising or restating of information, but perhaps I’m just not asking those sorts of questions much.