I’m not sure why people want that
There often are multiple communities for the same thing. Rust for example. The result is that in some interest fields posts are often cross-posted to a bunch of same communities. With Piefed displaying all comments from all cross-posts, there is little need to switch between communities. But if the post is good, I feel it should receive a vote not only in the community that just happened to be on top of the feed
I already have a bunch of my own feeds. My issue is that from UX perspective those work best when I have them opened as separate tabs on laptop. In PWA there are no tabs. And in the feeds dropdown not all are shown, only a handful. So in order to check what’s new in a bunch of feeds (too big to get notification about all that’s happening in those) in PWA, I have to
Being able to switch between my feeds like between “subscribed” and “local” would be much better
Yes, I think that would be an acceptable implementation
No, like having my feeds instead of “subscribed”, “local”, “popular”. Ideally with a way to mark which feeds I want on the list
When I view a tag on my mastodon account, I see posts from people I don’t follow because someone from my instance is following that person?
Cross-posting text-only posts
I think it’s a messy idea, you will be getting conflicts on files already present in the system. You’ve been warned ;)
With that out of the way, I guess just download the image and start from https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Installation_guide#Installation
UI: instead of Lemmy-like main view, offer a list of selected feeds as tabs in the main view
Watch tags from mastodon, even if no community was pinged. “Tag as community” so to speak
One vote action for all cross-post posts
So the plan is kind of like porting GameBoy Pokemon/Final Fantasy game (you walk on the map, then suddenly the combat begins with different mechanic) to a TTRPG?
I’m not very familiar with commander format, but I don’t think it’s one of the fastest ones. So if I were doing this, I would try to minimize the mechanics between the combat. I would take Blades in the Dark, strip all the setting, playbooks, distill it to a bunch of approaches basically and reskin them as it fits the game.
And then maybe take a look at Traveller quadrant(?) generation tools for coming up with map hexes? That one might be a bad advice, I’m not using hexes in general
FWIW, in my feeds that is on the same level as it was for some time now
I swear, this guy is all over the place. I’m very curious as what he will end up
I’ve only got this
Then how would they sell access in a deniable way?
Ah, you mean for fediverse to work as an LDAP?
My point is Let’s imagine we have a board on some instance. You use your account on another instance to ask the owner of the board to give you access to the board. The contents of the board are, IMO in most cases of such boards, “members only”. So any changes happening inside should not be sent out to federating instances. Otherwise, privacy of such boards would be at the mercy of privacy of other instances. If restricted changes were sent out, technically speaking, any server it federates to can choose to show that content to everyone. Which means you won’t be able to access the contents via any other instance. Apart from the logging in part, you will still need to go to the instance hosting the board. Unless it would be for publicly accessible boards only, like codeberg issues. That use-case could work
It’s all spiraling out of control
Beam me up, Scotty!
I understand that this proposal is to have separate voting controls per cross-posted community, not automatically upvote all