Beginning in Git 2.43, Git will realize when it’s about to perform a double-revert, and instead produce the much more pleasing message

Doesn’t happen very often, but I’m glad we have a better solution to this now.

Please consider posting language specific questions to language specific communities in the future. For example, !c_lang@programming.dev

I think what Cargill is saying is that the last 10% of the code takes as much effort as the first 90%. And he is humorously referring to all the overtime people have to put in to get things done on time. That’s why it adds to 180%.

This sounds more like a Github question.

Reading the manual? That’s cheating!

Apart from the historical value, the most important part of this article now is the “Note of reflection” added 10 years after it’s inception:

If your team is doing continuous delivery of software, I would suggest to adopt a much simpler workflow (like GitHub flow) instead of trying to shoehorn git-flow into your team.

I don’t think this work flow is relevant any more even for teams that don’t do CD, to be honest. It was a messy work flow to begin with and I haven’t seen it applied successfully in practice.

Note that with OAuth nothing much will change - the app will still have access to the JWT token which is used to impersonate you.

The user will have the option to revoke access for your application.

That’s the main reason I don’t use any apps. I don’t think there is a real need to suspect the official UI. If one doesn’t trust the instance admins, then they should rather migrate.

In case of an application running on a server, there is no reliable way to make sure that the source being shared is the source that is deployed. As I said, I don’t think you have any ulterior motives. I’m only trying to raise awareness around a specific problem with Lemmy. Perhaps I should create a separate post about this in relevant communities, if it hasn’t been done already.

I agree that this is a feature Lemmy lacks and would be great to have in the core. And thank you for taking the time to create it. However, asking for username and password is a security problem. I’m not attributing any ill intent to your work, but something like this can very well be used to harvest account credentials. So I would advise people to not use solutions like this.

Unfortunately Lemmy doesn’t provide a better way to implement this kind of add-ons. Hopefully one day it will have a better Auth system. Until then, I think I will stick to the official UI and hope that this will come to core :)

I have had Pluralsight for many years now and I agree with you. In some cases they have excellent courses, but I sometimes find the content outdated. I plan to explore O’Reily’s platform next year. They seem to have a different set of resources and are comparable in price.

deleted by creator

GPT-4 was able to do this even though the training data for the version tested by the authors was entirely text-based. That is, there were no images in its training set. But GPT-4 apparently learned to reason about the shape of a unicorn’s body after training on a huge amount of written text.

It’s as if they can in some way or other “see”.

Is the bot open source? If so, where does it reside?

Good bot!

@CommunityLinkFixer@lemmings.world

Does it also work with links in markdown

I believe there is already a browser add on for this. Cannot remember the name right now.

Edit: I think this should be in Lemmy core.

Good bot

Thank you very much for this!

@CommunityLinkFixer@lemmings.world