I don’t know. It’s an authorized profession over here, and prices are regulated by the government.

Yes I can see the risk.

Just a small adjustment to his stiff neck issue that he picked up a few months ago

This hits hard…

I woke up early today (without an alarm) because I had to bring my dog to a chiropractor at noon.

So I had a cup of coffee and a pipe, watching the morning dew dry up

It’s one of 3 days off this week, and that’s only because I sacrificed one additional day off to fake an extra shift on Friday. It pays double though, because of union regulations, even though I’d have taken it for regular pay anyway.

The only difference is, that I don’t have friends to meet up with, mostly because I don’t want to, and that I’m not in a drinking mode yet, but sounds like I could pick that up at some point

It’s fine. I already had. Akon interview last week and got the job for substitute hours in a city close by.

The thing is, that organisation is in the same situation as the one I’m in. They have people employed, who want more hours but they aren’t allowed to give them, because of the union. So their people have to find work in my city, some even where I work, and I have to find extra work there… it’s just innefective and a waste, it seems like

I am new in this. Been at it for just over a year and only just got a full time, no end contract in February so I don’t feel like I can press too hard. I feel like I pressed pretty hard to get the contract so I’ll let it rest for now.

The EU ion actually told me that any wage negotiation needs to go through the representative at the organization but they feel like I could be eligible for a higher pay even though I am not officially (don’t have enough experience on the field but I am good at it, have had no sick days and have multiple years experience from a similar job that uses a different union so it does not officially count as experience)

I feel like the union has been a bit limiting for my situation although know they are there to protect me. It’s just not very flexible and maybe built around fairly rigid and predefined stereotypical employee lifestyles

In my field of work, and in my country, the wages are set. At least it’s an agreement between the employer and th union. I can’t bargain or press for higher wages. My wage is predefined and will go up according to a preset because of the union

I have 37 hours a week. This is the maximum hours they allow.

I am happy for my job and I’d rather do more of something that makes me happy than have to look for an extra job in a different place. Let alone have to go to a different place of work when I could as well take more hours where I am. They do need extra employees but have to hire substitutes to cover the work

Same I. Denmark. That said it’s very common for the employee to ask about it, because it’s vital information when it comes to working conditions (both good and bad). It can be quite limiting some times.

My boss is maybe happier for union than me.

I want to work more hours but they won’t let me because of the agreement with the union.

I live in Denmark 🤘

It’s more a question about using or abusing a smile:

https://www.ohlalafrenchcourse.com/en/blog/article/why-aren-t-the-french-nice

I know that in some (many) cultures, the American “smile” can be unnerving

Maybe the smile

It’s making fun of a secretary of war, who can’t tell the difference between a bible verse and a movie quote

You’ll find dirt anywhere you go looking for it, if you dig deep enough.

Sorry. I meant accumulated wealth. English is my second language

My point is not political. It’s more social. Spend your money while you’re living instead of hoarding it

I think you’re reading into this, what you want to read and not what I’m saying

My point was that if we all started from scratch, and fortunes weren’t passed over from generations to generations, the social and economic gap would be smaller

Prices would adjust to what people could pay

Not necessarily

You assume that there is wealth and that it should be regulated

It’s more of a cultural thing, where people actually use their wealth while they can and when they can’t, they pass it over to a charity of their choosing.

This at least is very common here

https://www.dyrenesbeskyttelse.dk/testamente

This is because some people still can afford to pay outrageous prices or willing (forced) to go into unreasonable debt.

Prices adjust to what people can afford. When you have people who can pay whatever you are asking, prices go up.

Same goes with loans. In fact, you some times you can’t even get a loan for an affordable house if it is in a location where the bank feels is hard to sell

At least Trump has learned to have others, who are disposable, say what he wants to say.

It’s not so much MAGATs. How can the news allow people to say stuff like this to the public.

The real issue is our quality expectations to the news distribution

It does actually.

If people didn’t pass over huge fortunes to their kids, and everyone had to start from scratch, then the housing market would be a lot more equal