I went with the Super Adventure Box title for a long time, “Honors in Applied Jumping” I think it was. Kept that one because of how much fun I had with SAB. Eventually switched to “The Extra Life” with the hope that it might encourage others to donate, and I’ve been using that since.

Though I think there was one from season 3 that I used for a short while too that was a bit difficult or time consuming to get, can’t quite remember it though.

Yes there is, I literally have it installed on my two LG WebOS TVs. Plus there’s a web browser app that you can create shortcuts for, which works for Dropout so I would assume it works for Jellyfin as well.

I started switching to tor-browser when they do this. Not sure why they allow tor but not vpn, but hey if it works it works.

It’s not as direct, but Star Wars Andor has this kind of energy to it.

What app are you using? That spoiler tag isn’t working for me on Jerboa.

Yeah, I’ve seen the term applied more broadly than MLs even, and agree that ‘no tankie behavior’ should be removed.

Just having ‘no authoritarian behavior’ should suffice anyway right?

Still worth flooding their inboxes. Make it more expensive for them to keep him unbanned.

I totally missed that the first time I watched it. That’d be awesome.

Yeah, I guess I was just hoping for more of a new generation type reveal, rather than a sequel to the Switch. Better hardware is definitely a plus though, would be nice to replay TotK or Pokemon SV with better graphics & performance. I still wonder if those two games were meant to release alongside a Switch 2 prior to the chip shortage.

I don’t follow - is it going to somehow transform into something that isn’t a switch?

Can’t help but be a little disappointed. The last few consoles have all been pretty drastically different, but this is just the Switch released again. Only with different connections so you need all new accessories.

DivestOS seems like a solid choice too

He’s such a fucking creep.

Indeed - in retrospect, I probably should have illustrated both.

I’m like 50% sure you’re trolling me here. Was there something specific in the comment I referenced that didn’t make sense? Or did you not read it?

There’s no moral victory in what I posted. I’m trying to call attention to these useless attacks that disregard Palestinians.

And I only see one person mentioning not to participate in elections, unless somehow people I’ve blocked are allowed to comment or something?

sigh We shouldn’t have to constantly bring up every possible angle, every possible nuance, just to avoid accusations like this. The accelerationists are for sure another example of this. I wrote a more detailed explanation in another comment.

No, I’m not saying it’s just one or the other. What you describe is another example of this.

What motivated me to make this though, is the sheer quantity of these types of comments, combined with the knowledge that many of those who were in that situation of not wanting to vote for Harris felt that way because they had family that were killed by the administration sending over weapons. I don’t know about you, but if I had family that was gone as a result of this administration’s actions, I’m not sure I’d be able to bring myself to vote for them. And the type of comment I used in the image strikes me as particularly insulting given that context. The existence of Palestinians is ignored while they are simultaneously being used as a tool in the discourse. And no good can possibly come from a comment like this, aside from the commenter temporarily feeling better about themselves.

And to reiterate, yes, white people disregarding the very real genocidal consequences of not voting is also an example. But a lot of that was blown out of proportion too. The lesser of two evils logic holds in swing states, sure. But in states guaranteed to vote one way or the other, a protest vote largely doesn’t matter.

Hope that helped to clarify.

Basically, yeah. The example used in the video was about immigrant students potentially being doxxed by a conservative planning to give a speech at a university, with the “white moderates” being okay with this (not taking the “bluff”) as a part of their strategy. The point being that “weaponizing or disregarding students of color is still racism.”

The same kind of applies here. The commenter was using palestinians as a tool to attack the people they disagree with, completely disregarding the palestinians in the process.

Then they don’t have to use the word “pathological”. If they aren’t reminding people that the fascist liar is a liar, then they are part of the problem.