Why will no doctor prescribe them? They are much healthier than smoking. And all the patient has to do is say they’re trying to quit smoking.

Both sides same!

Fun.

This is downright interesting.

Except your exposure to burn pits.

I remember seeing a video of an Indian couple berating a black woman because she was black. I read into that that they think they’re adjacent to white (I hate using those terms).

Anyway from the article

“Christian voices should be the main voice of America. And I want to know basically why you seem to be, and I don’t mean to be horribly offensive, but why you seem to be masquerading as a Christian?” one woman in the crowd asked. The young man who followed her was even more direct. “If you are an Indian, a Hindu, coming from a different culture, different religion, than those who founded this country—those who grew this country, built this country, made this country the beautiful thing that it is today—what are you conserving? You are bringing change,” he said. The man went on to ask Ramaswamy how he could represent Ohioans, when 64 percent of them are Christian.

In today’s installment of it’s always projection: they want to indoctrinate children so assume everyone else also wants to.

Surely they won’t come after my rights. - Conservatives and conservative voters.

Reminder that Clarence hates liberalism and thinks it ruined his life. Best I can think is that he’s annoyed that people think he was hired under affirmative action.

John 14:6

Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.

Well you just have to make everyone rich first! Then when everyone’s rich they can solve the problem all by themselves! (Jordan Peterson’s argument for climate change.)

AI prevention?

There’s not much more to say. You basically found something that’s barely more than a typo (they should have added another “read”, but it’s fully explained in the article).

All you need to say was “in case you read only the subheader, he didn’t adapt it, it was already adapted” but instead you’re running around screaming at everyone and everything “Lies lies it’s all lies! Everything is lies! Don’t believe anything! Shit rag! Disinformation!”

Uh no I’m saying the actual amount is 40x and 10x. Not legal, actual.

And uh no I clearly have the number for specifically dieselgate affected vehicles. (Well 10x is for all diesel if you’re thinking of only that. 40x was dieselgate and "France had 984,064 dieselgate affected vehicles.)

Rivers are natural points for cities, almost every city not on the coast is on the river because that’s how it was originally settled. So to have half the city in one state and the other half of the city in the other state is absurd. People build across anything but again cities are naturally on rivers.

Economically the immediate area on both sides of a river are going to be similar, so you should have the same administration. It’s when you get away from the river that this changes and you might want different administration.

You’re being incredibly picky on one line in the article that he adapted it when it was already adapted. The headline is correct, “Hegseth reads fake Bible verse from Pulp Fiction during Pentagon sermon”.

He read it. And it’s of course fake. I’m gonna say he had to know it was based on pulp fiction and not based on Ezekiel.

And even more absurd, he read it during a Christian prayer to a Christian congregation (also fucked up that this was at the Pentagon). He’s willfully combining made up I’m 14 and edgy shit with actual religion, in a public and government setting. This is the epitome of a teenager talking smack on call of duty, except it’s in public during official business.

Borders along rivers make no sense, fight me.

If he’s at Dad puns, you might be a grandfather.

See my original comment for the math. The effect is staggering.

Plot 1 was 2007 to 2022. Plot 2 was 2007 to 2024.

Also NOx emission standards for cars have been unchanged since 2014 for diesel and petrol.

Uhh this is about dieselgate illegally breaking the limits, not what the legal limits were/are.

basically nothing to do with these stats about Paris

I added the math to my original comment. France had 984,064 affected vehicles.