Heh

  • @DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    138 months ago

    I think it goes beyond not being able to “see” it and goes to we can’t detect it at all. Doesn’t dark matter just fill in the mathemagical holes with some numbers to make it all work?

    • @SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      158 months ago

      We can detect its gravitational influence, as it interacts via gravity. The issue being that gravity is a weak force, and so there’s a lot of room for speculation.

      But there is a lot of evidence backing up dark matter existing. But it’s not definitive yet.

      • @DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        18 months ago

        I get that but it still sounds woo-woo since we can’t directly detect it. I’m not naysaying since I realize it’s the best we have and I’m not smart enough to come up with anything better.

        • I mean, I guess it depends on what you mean by “directly detect”. We measure neutrinos by having photoreceptors in huge tanks of very pure water deep under old salt mines… which hardly seems more direct than looking at where galaxies and stars are moving and calculating the gravitational pull and noticing that something is missing…

    • @Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      98 months ago

      Dark matter is matter that we infir to exist only on its gravitational effects. We’ve observed its existence by the fact that it seems to clump up in the middle of two massive super-solar structures following a collision.