• @flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5817 hours ago

    Once ads are allowed into a platform they will ultimately be what destroys it eventually.

    Might take a week or a decade. But the lust of that easy ad money will ruin the thing they were put there to fund in the end.

    • @GeneralInterest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      415 hours ago

      I don’t think that’s necessarily true - maybe it depends on (a) the owners of the platform and/or (b) whether there are sources of funding besides advertising

      E.g. here in the UK, the BBC and Channel 4 are both broadcasters owned by the government, and both are funded at least in part by adverts. But I think both of them are relatively healthy and aren’t on the brink of destroying themselves.

      I think most of the BBC’s funding comes from the licence fee (British people pay for a TV licence) but they make some money from ads shown to international audiences. Channel 4 is solely funded by adverts I think, but it’s owned by the government and I think they have to abide by certain rules and targets.

      • @Hamartia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 hours ago

        In the UK the BBC only has advertisements for its own content, nothing else. As bad as its got since Tony Blair and David Cameron both undermined its independence and quality, at least there are no ad breaks in its shows.