Local and state governments have a unified goal to transform a suburb plagued by generational disadvantage into an economic powerhouse.

  • AJ Sadauskas
    link
    fedilink
    3
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    @ajsadauskas@lemmy.ml Over the past few weeks, The Age has run an interesting series looking at whether Clayton, Box Hill or Sunshine could become a Parramatta-style second CBD for Melbourne.

    Given Melbourne’s massive suburban sprawl, a second CBD (or four) is definitely needed.

    For what it’s worth, I think Box Hill is the closest, except for the lack of office space and company headquarters there. But the argument for Sunshine is growing…

    "Of the three, Sunshine requires the most effort and imagination: it has little medium-density development and limited job options for highly skilled workers. Tired roads are crammed with traffic or unfriendly to walkers and cyclists, and the area still has high levels of disadvantage.

    "However, elevating this suburb to mini-CBD status would be transformative for the area and the greater western metropolitan region.

    “Following the expected completion of the airport rail in 2029, Sunshine station will be the link between Melbourne Airport and the rest of metropolitan Melbourne, as well as parts of regional Victoria. It would also eventually benefit from being a stop on the Suburban Rail Loop if the western and northern sections are ever funded.”

    The case for Sunshine: https://www.theage.com.au/link/follow-20170101-p5cvjh

    The case for Box Hill: https://www.theage.com.au/link/follow-20170101-p5cvjf

    The case for Clayton: https://www.theage.com.au/link/follow-20170101-p5cvhy

    #vicpol #Urbanism #UrbanPlanning #Sunshine #Victoria #Melbourne