• @ddplf
      link
      19
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      Ah yes, spoken like a true elitist asshole

        • @ddplf
          link
          322 days ago

          And then a few more any time you actually want to use it.

          And then double it each time you have to decipher the existing one

          Just don’t use regex unless there is really no other way, and when you absolutely have to - frankly, that’s one of the ultra rare occasions I recommend using the AI.

            • @ddplf
              link
              -1
              edit-2
              22 days ago

              That I do, yes, because that’s a small chunk of code that - when necessary - would have to be completely remade anyways, not just modified.

                • @ddplf
                  link
                  122 days ago

                  That’s your opinion my man

                  I’m not gonna continue using arguments if all you can respond with is cynicism, apparently I wasn’t wrong about the elitism part

                  • @MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    122 days ago

                    Getting butthurt and personal over an offhand remark in a humour community is really toxic and you should probably work on that.

                    I trust that you can be better, my good buddy ❤

    • @Speiser0@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      1122 days ago

      Regular expressions in general, and automata theory, sure you should know about that. But a specific extended regex language like here? That’s like saying you’re shit at coding if you can’t do <insert arbitrary programming language here>.

          • @gwilikers@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            622 days ago

            Yeah, I’ve found myself wasting quite a lot of time thinking of the ‘perfect regex’ for task X only to realise that I could have avoided doing so by simply taking a different approach.